Making the Best of SkillGym Analytics

 

SkillGym Analytics provides the trainee with extensive information, offering the possibility to delve deep into the dynamics of a conversation in order to understand how and where behaviors can improve.

However, understanding how behaviors interact with one another and which rules influence the different KPIs, requires some fundamental knowledge of the behavioral models and methodology behind SkillGym.

In this article, we’ll review some basic information that can be very useful in accurately reading the SkillGym conversation analytics and in fully understanding how our scoring criteria work.

 

1) Confidence

The first and most important KPI in SkillGym is CONFIDENCE.

  • From a conceptual perspective, Confidence measures the degree of courage, determination, fearlessness and self-perceived experience with which leaders approach a conversation.
    From this perspective, confidence increases with experience: The more the conversation is held and the more the outcomes are reflected upon, the higher the confidence over time. Ultimately, it is the performance in conversations that matters.
  • From a practical perspective, SkillGym measures Confidence as the result of the overall quality with which each specific skill is used throughout the conversation. We consider not only the absolute quality of each behavior, but also the context: The specific situation and the flow (dynamic development) of the conversation.

 

Consider that:

  • In order to be well used, a skill might require a different behavior depending on the specific context. This means the same skill can be developed by using different behaviors as the context varies.
  • Behaviors are “hidden” in the way the user’s sentences are presented. For example, a text box saying, “How would you like to proceed?” includes a behavior named “asking open-ended questions” related to a skill named “Asking questions”.
  • Whether such behavior scores high or low depends on the context in which it is used. SkillGym measures such scores while automatically taking into account the entire (and dynamic) flow of the conversation.

 

The best way to improve on Confidence in SkillGym is to select sentences that you deem not only appropriate from a dialogue perspective, but also fitting in the real-time context (with whom you are talking to, how is it going so far, etc.).

Over time, by using the post-conversation analyses with the Augmented Replay, you will find it easier and easier to make this decision based on the understanding of the body language of the character in front of you.

 

2) Self-Awareness

Our second most important KPI is called Self-Awareness.

Self-Awareness measures the quality of the self-perception of the performance, as compared to the evaluation done by SkillGym.

This is a very important KPI since a higher level of Self-Awareness is normally associated with better performance and a faster improvement track.

 

SkillGym measures Self-Awareness in this way:

  • At the end of the conversation, you are presented with a self-assessment comprised of a few questions in which you evaluate your performance based on certain competencies/skills/behaviors.
  • SkillGym will make the same evaluation based on your actual performance.
  • The comparison between the two values results in the self-awareness score.
  • The higher the self-awareness score, the closer the two evaluations are to each other.

One very interesting article about Self-Awareness and its importance as a fundamental KPI in soft-skills development can be found here (“Self-Awareness: the Single Factor Influencing the Most the Speed of Leadership Development”).

 

3) Objectives

In SkillGym, Objectives are three specific task-oriented outcomes that the trainee is asked to achieve during the conversation.

For each conversation, the three objectives are well outlined in the preparation room and, during the conversation, they are connected to three specific steps of the dialogue.

 

The Augmented Replay shows the position of the objectives using three small, numbered icons that can be found attached to the general timeline of the conversation at the bottom of the screen.
Their color (green or red) shows the outcome; clicking the icon will open a pop-up with a detailed description of the reasons why the objective has or has not been achieved.

 

The way SkillGym calculates the outcome of each objective is a bit tricky.

One of the common mistakes is to think that there is a 100% correlation between the score of Confidence and the achievement of the conversation objectives.

Although this is true in most cases (great behaviors generate great quality of the conversation that, in the end, will generate the achievement of the objectives), SkillGym is not a deterministic exercise. It is primarily a simulation where the contextual flow of the conversation matters a lot.

So for example, in certain cases even just a small deception along the way (for example an unlucky sentence at a certain point of the conversation) could upset the character to the point where at the moment of deciding whether or not to adhere to what you propose (typically one of the objectives of the conversation) he will react the other way.

 

The result could then be:

  • A reasonably high score in Confidence (in our example one or two low-scoring behaviors won’t affect this score that much), but
  • Still one (or sometimes more) objectives not achieved

Of course, this won’t happen that frequently. However, it is important to keep in mind that every behavior counts in a conversation, which is why we separate these two important KPIs – Confidence and Objective – to support trainees in experiencing the actual degree of balancing between the two dimensions.

 

It can even occur sometimes that the character shows a good reaction (You can check this inside the Augmented Replay, by taking a look at the single objective; in the picture below it’s where it says “genuine”).

The objective can still be marked as “not achieved” because of the trainee’s earlier behaviors that will still impact the outcome at the end of the conversation. (In this case, the simulation presumes that the character’s good – still instantaneous – reaction will be overcome by the overall weight of some negatively associated behaviors).

Again, this won’t happen frequently, but it’s worth considering as a good lesson.

 

4) Phases

SkillGym provides the trainees with the opportunity to understand the impact of their behaviors at different phases of a conversation. Although the conversation is a continuum where every single step is influenced by what happened before and influences what will happen next, for the purpose of learning and development, it is interesting to analyze its dynamics by splitting the entire exercise into smaller chunks.

At this level, the Analytics will present a certain number of macro-steps (or “phases”) for which the trainees can understand the relative quality of their Confidence score for each step. Such score is measured in percentage and also visualized with a very intuitive color code.

This allows trainees to work on these metrics in order to select a specific area of the conversation upon which to improve.

 

5) Competencies

We discuss how a Competency model works in SkillGym in this very interesting article (“Making a Competency Model Truly Actionable in People’s Development”), which we recommend reading for a more in-depth description of this important set of KPIs.

In short:

  • Competencies are measured on observable behaviors, and observable behaviors are the way the dialogue is built.
  • So, every time you choose a sentence, you are expressing one observable behavior.
  • According to the specific context in which that sentence was used, such behavior will get a score.
  • The scores of different behaviors – measured along the way – are summed up according to SkillGym’s competency mapping model (most often remapped on the competency model of our customer).

 

Since competencies are an aggregated measure, their interpretation is more powerful when analyzed as the result of multiple conversations played over time. However, they can be a good indicator even at the end of a single conversation.

In fact, many employees are presented with Competency models that sometimes look a little abstract and they are not easy to apply to everyday behaviors.  That’s why measuring the outcome of a conversation against a competency model can be an useful exercise.

 

What’s next

Imagine how much faster and smarter your Leaders can grow their skills, gain confidence and self-awareness as well as gain experience in Critical Conversations by practicing in a Digital Role Play system like SkillGym, which provides up to eight different learning triggers of this kind.

 

You may now be interested in trying the power of SkillGym.

Please also peruse our website. There are plenty of inspiring pre-recorded webinars and articles. Of course, we would be delighted to continue this conversation with you; simply book a 1-hour discovery call here.

Leave a Reply

Managers Can’t be Coaches Without Practicing Conversations

 

When given the opportunity to learn and grow, people thrive. By adopting a coaching mentality and approach, managers can help members of their team realize their potential.

Why should managers devote time and effort to coaching their team?

Research shows that coaching leads to better engagement, higher productivity and enhanced customer service. It also helps an employee improve performance, overcome challenges, reach goals and build self-confidence.

 

The importance of coaching over just managing

To become a true Leader, a manager must develop the ability to coach others.
It is core skill required of every successful manager in the 21st century.

We all know that the days of command and control leadership as a standard way of managing people are long gone.

 

However, the art of coaching -today’s most effective way for managers to lead- requires learning a set of skills. If managers do not become skilled at coaching their employees, it is unlikely that they will be able to achieve sustainable long-term positive results for themselves or their organizations.

There are many different definitions of coaching, but the following one is the most appropriate for this case:

“Coaching is about connecting with people, inspiring them to do their best and helping them to grow. It’s also about challenging people to come up with the answers they require on their own.” Ed Batista

 

Several in-field studies report how a poor coaching-oriented management style has bad consequences on the motivation and productivity of employees.
Developing the skills and changing a managerial approach amid daily demands can be difficult.

 

On the other hand, it is widely demonstrated that organizations become more productive and employees become more engaged when adopting these two organizational habits:

  • Managers using listening skills and communication to involve others, setting clear performance expectations, self-awareness (Sparks and Gentry 2008)
  • Subordinates having regular conversations with Leaders or coaches where individual and organizational goals are discussed, Leaders give constructive feedback, both positive and negative, and Leaders reflect on their own leadership practices (Larsson and Vinberg 2010)

 

As a way of managing people, coaching demands for a set of new approaches such as:

  • Collaborating instead of controlling
  • Delegating more responsibility
  • Talking less, listening more
  • Giving fewer orders, asking more questions
  • Giving specific feedback instead of making judgements

 

Shifting towards a coaching approach clearly requires the development of strong conversational skills and here again, research supports the idea that the majority of managers widely underperform in the ability to develop their teams through authentic, empowering and effective conversations, which are at the core of coaching.

 

What types of manager can benefit most from coaching skills?

All managers, regardless of level, should be trained in how to inspire and empowering employees rather than just telling them what to do; this provides opportunities for growth, development and autonomy.

Some levels, however, are particularly indicated when it comes to be identified as potential facilitators of a leadership culture based on coaching:

 

 

These groups are most exposed to the opportunity -very often accompanied by the fear- of coaching their employees to the highest possible performance achievement hand engagement.

At the same time, they represent an incredible opportunity for the organization as a whole to change gear and start performing at a new level: They are the best gateway to inject a new leadership culture through example, nudge and listening.

 

 

What are the benefits of practicing on conversations for Leaders aspiring to become coaches?

Practice is the most effective way to improve conversational skills and to shift the approach of managers toward coaching.
The more you practice, the more you gain confidence and raise your self-awareness.

Your comfort zone starts to expand as soon as you move the first step toward consistent practice. Practicing by interacting in critical conversations is the best way to improve managers’ ability to coach their employees.

 

The typical shift in observable behaviors we normally see in Leaders undergoing a consistent practice program on conversations can be summarized as follows:

Manager Approach Coach Approach
Answer questions when asked Asks questions to help employees better understand options and strategies
Describes excellence to team Models excellence by working with team members and mentoring achievement
Evaluates results and provides feedback Observes behaviors and provides feedback
Provides coaching when necessary Provides coaching as an ongoing priority
Coaches extemporaneously Follows structured coaching strategy
Gives team members action steps to follow and then resumes other duties Guides team members through steps as they implement action plan
Provides feedback during evaluation and occasionally between evaluations Provides timely, consistent feedback during the daily flow of work
Treats obstacles with team members as the real issues Probes issues with team members to discover the root cause behind the obstacles
Outlines challenges for team members Guides and supports team members as they uncover their own challenges

 

 

Which Skills get involved the most in this amazing shift?

There are many skills involved with this change of approach.
Just to mention the most prominent ones, I would say that the following twenty are for sure at the center of this revolution:

  1. Be aware of other people’s needs
  2. Aim for continuous improvement
  3. Be confident with the organization context
  4. Be diplomatic and tactful
  5. Be inspiring
  6. Communicate efficiently
  7. Ease change
  8. Encourage and value input
  9. Ensure accountability
  10. Find solutions
  11. Generate a positive mood
  12. Give credit and rewards
  13. Give immediate feedback when needed
  14. Have a clear vision of the problem
  15. Inspire standard of performance
  16. Manage objections
  17. Remove obstacles
  18. Set goals and long-term perspectives
  19. Share decisions made
  20. Tailor approach and speech

 

But those of you who follow my series here on the blog certainly know, by now, that the two most important indicators that get affected by practice are:

  • Confidence. The degree of courage, determination, fearlessness and self-perceived experience with which Leaders approach these types of conversation using a coach-oriented approach.
  • Self-Awareness. The degree of consciousness, precision and sharpness with which Leaders are capable of assessing their own performance at the end of the task.

 

 

What types of conversation can impact most this shift?

Leaders face every day a great number of occasions to enter conversations with their employees, and there are so many types of conversations to practice with that any list would fall short.

However, should I be asked to define a very short list of those conversations that can really make a huge difference in inspiring, developing and leading towards a better team performance, I would certainly indicate the following four:

  • Negotiating an objective. Leverage a coaching style to motivate the employees and to increase their self-confidence and self-esteem. They will perform better as well as strive for bigger challenges.
  • Delegating. One of the crucial tasks of any Leader. Adding a coaching approach will improve the employee’s performance, since they will feel rewarded and appreciated, encouraging them to stay motivated and keep up the good work.
  • Priority Setting Nudge. At some point, every employee needs a gentle push; a nudge to improve their performance. Coaching them through their daily organizational challenges will grow their ability to work better and more aligned with the company’s objectives.
  • Giving performance feedback. Feedback is a key moment of the relationship with employees. Being able to coach them through a better understanding of their current limits is essential to turn obstacles into opportunities.

 

 

How can you deliver meaningful practice to your Leaders?

Fostering the ability to leverage fruitful and empowering conversation throughout the entire organization is the new goal of any talent development professional, since more and more multi-directional and cross-function leadership conversations are needed.

This is even more important in view of the general tendency I outlined above: supporting Leaders to adopt a coaching style requires a great deal of innovation in training design, to make sure that practice on conversation is not only included but, even better, placed at the center of the journey.

 

Training on conversation means becoming an interactive part in a dialogue and receiving continuous and multi-source feedback not only on communication skills, but also on self-awareness and self-control.

Role Playing is one of the most important learning strategies for Conversational Leadership development.
However, as discussed in another article (“Digital Role Plays, the Best Way to Develop Conversational Leadership“) it does not come without some limitations if approached the traditional way.

 

Digital Role Play, instead, can be an interesting solution to overcome those limitations that are typical of the in-class approach.
In this article (“Digital Role Play Stripped Bare“) I explain what is a Digital Role Play and how it can be helpful to support a leadership training program aiming at delivering sound practice on conversations.

 

What is the typical effort in practicing to improve on coaching skills?

Having delivered thousands of practice bootcamps on conversations to support the transition of managers to a coaching approach, here are some of the evidences we collected on the field.
An average individual training schedule typically engages the trainee for 1-1.5 hour / month, with one or two simulations every other week.

On average, it takes between 5 and 6 months of regular training for 68% of trainees to gain an improvement of around 25% on their initial confidence level in the most popular types of conversations.

 

At the same time, we noticed that within 9 months of regular training, 92% of trainees achieve the same result.

We call it the efficient threshold of confidence, it’s where trainees get the greatest benefit in terms of performance at the most possible sustainable impact in terms of participation.

 

Where to go from here

You may now be interested in learning more about tips to select your next Digital Role Play system.
At the bottom of the article mentioned above (“Digital Role Plays, the Best Way to Develop Conversational Leadership“) I provide you with a detailed checklist about what to look at when deciding on which platform to adopt.

It is also very important to reflect on how to integrate Digital Role Play into your existing strategy, since too often these types of tools are just placed at the end of a classic course for a quick “follow-up” that, most of the time, does not add any value, which results in underutilization of the enormous power and potential of these kinds of solutions.

Read this article (“Flipping the Leadership Development Strategy with Actionable and Scalable Programs“) to learn more about the best way to truly integrate Digital Role Plays into your L&D strategy.

 

Finally, if you are interested in discovering how we here at SkillGym deliver the best in class Digital Role Plays, feel free to book a 1-hour discovery call.

Leave a Reply

Planning Training for Success, 12 Best Practices

 

Designing a successful training program, especially in the area of leadership development, is not at all easy these days.

Leaders seem to have already learned everything you can tell them. Let’s face it, most leadership training programs out there revolve around the same boiler plate concepts.

 

At the same time, it seems like the way they are delivered -the outdated formal class-based education- never stops being the number one choice of trainers.
Despite evidence clearly indicates that it is neither enjoyed by trainees, nor is there any significant proof of practical results -aside from those flashy and useless vanity metrics- that can be shown to sponsors.

 

Leaders seem to have already learned everything that you can tell them. Let’s face it, most leadership training programs out there revolve around the same boiler plate concepts.

 

Still, too many L&D managers continue to rely on obsolete formats and tricks to enroll, train, entertain and develop Leaders.

 

We are already facing a new generation of Leaders

The situation, however, will become increasingly unsustainable in the near future, since the new generations of Leaders are on the rise and they expect things like:

  • Actionable training activities vs mere knowledge transfer
  • Measurable results vs happy classroom time
  • Clear effort/outcome balance
  • Interactive sessions
  • Technology as a natural way to gain both in knowledge and experience

 

As many of you already know from following my series in this blog, here at SkillGym, I am passionate about understanding what makes good strategies truly great.
Hence, I couldn’t refrain from observing the way our clients have implemented their training strategies and, most of all, how those strategies have shifted over time to leverage the best practices that were acquired on the go.

 

The result is one reflection and 12 rules that are derived from what 12 outstanding companies are doing when delivering great leadership training.
I am confident you will appreciate these.

My hope is that some of them may be the inspiration for your next program.
That would make my work worth doing and, certainly, this article worth reading.

 

We can’t afford to continue with the status quo

Let’s start with the one reflection I have prepared for you.

It’s very simple: we can’t afford to continue to plan, design and deliver leadership courses as we have done for the past 70 years.
Times change, people change, the world changes too.

 

So often I feel like the only ones who don’t recognize this compelling urgency to refresh the way training is conceived and delivered are the same people in charge of making it change: HR and L&D departments that spend every day passionately working on the very difficult task of developing people.

 

We can’t afford to continue to plan, design and deliver leadership courses as we have done for the past 70 years.

 

Guys, the clock is ticking.

A new generation of Leaders is already here, and many more will come soon.
And they are not, mark my words please, they are not the same as their predecessors.
These up-and-comings are smart, more technology oriented, less formal and much more demanding for purpose and actionable results.

So please, take a look at what I have seen being done at some of the greatest companies already delivering 21st century-style successful leadership training.

 

I have been following those 12 companies for over two years now, carefully analyzing:

  • The type of training programs they designed around leadership
  • The way they enrolled and involved trainees
  • The program around which the courses were delivered
  • The techniques and the strategies of delivery
  • The way they measured effort and results
  • The way they kept trainees involved and engaged over time

 

Many of those courses were great ones, appreciated by trainers, trainees and their sponsors.
Many were just average, and some were absolutely fiascos.

Through it all, I took note of something that was definitely contributing to the success.

 

The secret is not (just) technology

You may think that, since I founded a company delivering hi-tech for experiential learning, the scope of this article could be to praise the use of technology as THE way to deliver successful training.
But that’s not actually the case.

 

As I pointed out in a previous article (“Three Case Studies and One Strategy to Keep Users Engaged with Digital Learning”), we ourselves have learned that lesson the hard way.
Technology is definitely a very important ingredient to consider when planning good and balanced leadership training as a means of delivering the experiential part.

Technology alone won’t make any difference if it is not well blended within a comprehensive strategy. But I don’t want to put the cart before the horse here.

I am sure that the following part of this article will provide you with a lot of elements supporting this statement.

 

The framework of my research

Before entering the details of the 12 ideas that follow, let me give you a general framework to understand the context.

All of the following best practices are somehow related to the following elements:

  • They all refer to the design of training programs revolving around soft skill leadership development.
  • All are connected to courses where the average participant was a millennial -age range 30-40 y.o.
  • They all refer to programs that include some form of practical activity that follows, anticipates or sometimes overlaps formal education.
  • Most of the time, the ratio between knowledge transfer and practical activities in those programs was unbalanced in favor of the latter, sometimes with a ratio even greater that 2:1.
  • Almost all of them were collected by me, by analyzing the activities from the privileged position of being one of the partners of the design, providing our SkillGym solution as one of the tools for practicing what they learned and learning from what they practiced.
  • Therefore, all of them refer to program where technology-based learning was one of -but never the only one- the key ingredients of training design.
  • The companies from which I took these lessons belong to the most varied industries -ranging from banking and insurance, to car manufacturing, to oil and gas, to pharmaceutical and many more. This is just to say that the type of industry type is not a correlation factor.
  • Finally, they represent both SME and large corporations in size.

Ok, let’s start.

 

1. Tease trainees early on

Like any other initiative, training has to be ‘sold’ to trainees the right way.
The age of mandatory training is over and with voluntary training, enthusiasm and participation cannot be taken for granted.

I am not saying that you need to become a marketing expert, however, take a look at how media services are promoted.

Think of Netflix: they announce their series months in advance and keep on teasing the audience with bits of information that make their desire grow until they literally feel the need for that show.

 

I have seen several examples of how teasing trainees early on with a good dose of F.O.M.O. ‘marketing’ can turn the odds of overbooking a voluntary-based training course upside down.

In most cases the best strategies are the simplest:

  • Roll-up banners placed in high traffic places
  • Online short trailers delivered by email or placed on the intranet homepage
  • Emails with curious details
  • Involve well-known (also internal) testimonials

 

Do not forget that teasing requires recurrence. So, you should plan for a service that can make it automatic to ping your candidate trainees.
Again, without becoming an expert in inbound marketing, you can rely on digital solutions that allow users to pre-enroll with the scope of starting an early and automated campaign to develop awareness, attention, interest and action.

I have seen it in process, and it works.

 

2. Turn trainees into training experts

Another very important strategy is about raising the level of your trainees with regard to the insights of your job.

Adults want to know why they need to put efforts into something. They need a clear purpose.

This part is often left unattended.
If no methodological background is shared with trainees, the are left feeling like ‘it’s not their business’ to know why a certain learning strategy is applied, how it works and how they will benefit from it.

 

The most successful strategies I have seen include one dedicated module -it can easily be a pre-recorded video and won’t normally last longer than 30 minutes- that explains:

  • What learning strategy will be used and how it works
  • Why this strategy versus another
  • What types of benefits it will bring
  • What type of effort is expected from both sides to make things happen
  • Benchmark data to show how efficient this approach will be

 

In this way, learners become more aware of why they should be involved and what will happen along the way.

Onboarding the trainees to the training methods and on the reasons why is one of the most powerful engagement strategies I have seen.
As humans, we want to be part of something and sharing this part -which I realize is not an intuitive thing to do- turns passive audience into active players or “owners”.

 

3. Plan in months, not weeks

The impact of leadership training should be about rising awareness, improving in self-confidence and self-awareness as well as changing habits. This does not happen overnight.

It takes time. And it does not happen passively.

 

The most successful leadership training programs I have seen are those where the outline is planned in months, not days or weeks. It means designing a program that is 80% practice and 20% knowledge and the 80% practice is spread across months where trainees are gently nudged to consistently do something that, time after time, will gradually change their approach and, therefore, their results.

Of course, it takes longer, of course it will cost more effort and, sometimes, money -but not necessarily if well design and supported by smart technology.
However, it’s the only way I have seen, in years of experience, that can really turn concepts into action.

 

For example, the introduction of technological tools such as:

  • Automatic scheduling of self-paced activities
  • Smart measuring of weekly/monthly progress (see below about the importance of selecting smart metrics)
  • E-learning modules to consolidate knowledge
  • Digital Role Play (yes, we are in the business of Digital Role Plays) to practice

can help trainers not only to stretch the duration of the training experience, but also to provide meaningful activities and manage the continuous engagement in a semi-effortless way.

 

4. Focus on few, actionable metrics

No metrics, no measure, no improvement.
This is an old saying that remains very true. However, the opposite is also very true: too many metrics equals no metrics.

Balancing the quantity and type of metrics is a challenging task.

 

Once again, the best designed and most successful training programs I have seen are those including a great balance of quantitative and qualitative metrics, supporting:

  • The understanding of the dynamics of delivery
  • The delivery of proof-of-progression

I recently wrote an article fully dedicated to a reflection on leadership training metrics. It’s here (“8 Key Metrics to Ensure a Successful Practical Training on Critical Conversations”) and it’s worth reading to delve deeper on this specific point.

 

 

5. Adapt the schedule to individuals

Once you decide to design your next leadership training program with an 80/20 approach, where the “80” is the quota of time dedicated to long-term practicing, you need to define a schedule of practice.

It means setting up a calendar where you help your trainees to organize their training activity in terms of:

  • How often
  • When
  • How much
  • On what

they should practice.

 

Now, imagine having to organize this -which is absolutely a must-do if you want to ensure long-term commitment and engagement- for each of the many Leaders involved in the many training programs you have in parallel.

Two problems:

  • It takes a lot of time, so you need automation
  • It cannot be considered a one-off activity: the best results come from adapting the schedule on the go, preferably for each individual

This is a lot of manual work, if you don’t leverage technology here -and most probably also very difficult to achieve because you would need to analyze a lot of data on the past activities to significantly plan the future ones.

I dedicated a full article on how well technology can help to define adaptive individual schedules of practical training. Read it here (“SkillGym Digital Fitness: Pure, Adaptive Leadership Training”) to have a broader perspective of how to master this single best practice.

 

 

6. Read the sentiment about your approach

Of course, when a training program evolves from a few weeks into several months, you need to find a way to check the sentiment of your trainees along the way.
This is very important, not just to make sure that they are still alive and active, or merely to enjoy some vanity metrics showing how well your design is being delivered.

More importantly, you need to understand pretty early on if any adjustment should be considered.

 

A well-structured survey system will certainly help you; I would recommend the following principles:

  • Define a standard set of questions to ask, ideally between 5 and 10
  • Include open-ended questions (1 or 2) to collect opinions and suggestions
  • Stick to the same questions every time, to ensure comparability and trend-based analysis
  • Define a calendar where you will send the survey at least every quarter (if your program is less than 6 months, of course, you can change this)
  • Explain from the onset (remember the best practice No. 2 “turn trainees into experts”) the importance of this approach according to a win-win and reciprocal engagement-based way of fine-tuning the program along the way
  • Read the answers (it seems trivial, but I have seen many cases where the data are available, and no one cares) and act accordingly

 

 

7. Involve the top management

Little to add here.
I am sure you already know about this best practice.

And I am sure that you’ve been frustrated several times by not being able to stress to them enough the importance of their direct endorsement; unless you are lucky enough to work in the perfect organization.

However, it is not just about getting their endorsement, it is also about reporting results the right way. So, on one side, choosing the right metrics is very important; but defining a schedule and a “ceremony” of reporting are equally important.

 

Old-fashioned leadership training is by nature deficient of significant performance-related metrics, so the idea of presenting metrics to the top management did not have a large diffusion in the past.

The advent of digital training technology not only allows for better measurements, it also provides a lot of space for better marketing of those metrics upstream.
Again, it’s not a matter of vanity, it’s a practical issue: if you can deliver meaningful performance-oriented metrics and you do that on a consistent basis, you will create the conditions where they will feel the need to endorse your next training program, because they will perceive the value to them from your initiatives.

 

 

8. Consider individual contributors

This one is my favorite.
You can recognize a 20th century leadership design approach by the fact that leadership and management are almost two synonyms.

And the direct consequence is that leadership training programs are almost always dedicated to in-role managers or occasionally to the so called “high potentials”, who are destined toward formal authority roles and thus you are committed to prepare them early on.

Instead, a 21th century leadership culture is permeated by the idea of “influence without authority”, where individual contributors not only see the concept of leadership totally separated from that of authority, but they also expect to be considered as an active part of the process of influence.

 

I can’t go in-depth about this fascinating subject here (I will write one dedicated article soon) however one very successful best practice I have noticed in the development of leadership across the organization is definitely that of including Individual Contributors in the leadership training program planning.

Designing specific programs for them will make the flow of leadership fluid across the organization and will certainly contribute to improving the quality of your results as an L&D designer.

 

 

9. Plan formal education on evidence (aka “Flip your strategy upside-down”)

This is the hardest of all.
The reason is that it is 100% counter-intuitive. My colleague and friend Matteo wrote an excellent article (“Flipping the Leadership Development Strategy with Actionable and Scalable Programs”) on the idea of “flipping the training strategy”, which I recommend reading.

The article offers a very interesting reflection on the fact that it makes sense to evaluate a complete flip in the L&D strategy assuming long-term practice as a main activity to exploit the behavioral metrics that you want to address and develop with leadership training.

 

In a well-balanced strategy, “pit-stop” learning activities should be considered as an effective response to specific needs that emerge based on evidences collected in the scheduled practice.
In this way, they become timelier, more impactful and appreciated by learners in addition to being extremely measurable (as you can monitor their impact on the practice itself).

 

 

10. Promote peer2peer support

Collaboration is an excellent means of developing leadership.
Incidentally, the longer a practice activity lasts, the more the resources you will likely need to bring in for remote support.
Trainees will certainly come up with questions and support requests.

 

What I have seen is that the large majority of those inquiries can be dealt with using a peer-to-peer approach, which generates two different consequences:

  • On one side, you will be less involved directly, with a significant reduction of resources you need to put in
  • On the other side, peer-to-peer support will amplify the effect of practical training, benefiting both those who are in need and those who provide help

Again, turning your trainees into experts on your methodology will increase their motivation and commitment toward being an active part of the program.

 

 

11. Promote a diary

One of the classic problems of leadership training is that you teach about something that it is very hard to measure in terms of direct results on the organization performance, especially in the short term.

When introducing long-term practice, for example by means of scheduled on-line Digital Role Plays, you should also introduce the idea of keeping a diary of how leaders manage their daily activity in real life.

For example, ask them to keep track of:

  • How many conversations they do weekly
  • With whom and why
  • How they perceive their own performance
  • How well they managed the conversation’s objectives and phases

 

You will be amazed by the results, already after few weeks.
In fact, this task will nudge them to:

  • Connect the idea of leadership to that of people management through meaningful and possibly inspiring conversations
  • Think in terms of preparing their conversation in advance
  • Plan their conversations in terms of measurable strategies

 

At the same time, this approach will help you measure their improvement in terms of self-confidence and self-awareness, providing smart benchmarking on how effective your training activity really is -remember the part about reporting meaningful metrics upstream.

Finally, real life will pair your scheduled on-line training thus doubling the impact of on-the-job training, whether simulated or real-life.

 

 

12. Read the sentiment about your outcomes

As you do read the trainees’ sentiment on the way you deliver training just like you read the sentiment of your management on the metrics you deliver.

The same approach as discussed above, simply using a different target for a different purpose.
Resist the temptation to being isolated by bringing in the entire chain of stakeholders and easily turning your activity into one of the founding gears of the organization.

 

 

Some final reflections

It’s never easy to plan for success.
And it’s not just about applying a set of someone else’s best practices.

However, looking at what others are doing, with a genuine spirit of curiosity and an open and growth-oriented mindset is the right way to improve on a daily basis.

I hope this (long) article was helpful to you. It was certainly to me: reflecting and collecting the materials to write it helped me to structure some of the vast evidence I collected from around the world about the fact that you need to manage an increasing number of variables to deliver quality if not excellent training programs.

 

By the way, if you are intrigued about how digital technology applied to leadership development can really help you to make a huge difference in the way you deliver your training programs, here are two articles for you:

 

And finally, if you would like to know more or if you have unanswered questions, why not book a 1-hour discovery call with our experts here?

Enjoy the rest of your day.

Leave a Reply

Digital Role Play Stripped Bare

 

Digital Role Play is a digital tool, normally delivered online, designed to support a learning or coaching strategy in which the trainees are asked to play their own a role, involving a discussion with someone else on what should be considered a tough or a critical topic.

So, for example, it can be a simulation of a conversation between a Leader and an employee, between a salesperson and a client or whatever else. The scope is to discuss a topic that typically includes some elements of verbal negotiation.

 

 

There are other solutions on the market focusing on making decisions and managing complex and multi-variable contexts. Those are (or should be) normally defined as business games.

In these cases, the scope is mainly focused on analyzing one scenario or one situation and making decisions based on the available information.
For example, to manage risk or to optimize results. This article focuses on the first category.

 

Learning by Doing produces better results

Digital Role Plays are one interesting evolution of Role Play, a well-established learning strategy based on the principle of Learning by Doing. As you surely familiar with, Learning by Doing refers to a theory of education expounded by American philosopher John Dewey.

He theorized that learning should be relevant and practical, not just passive and theoretical.

 

 

Learning by Doing is based on learning from experiences. This approach allows learners to experience something with minimal guidance.
Learning by Doing assumes that learners learn best by being involved in the learning process.

Instead of being told or showing the answers, they are presented with a question, problem, situation, or activity, which they must make sense of for themselves.

We have previously discussed the benefits of learning through interactive storytelling, a smart way to make Learning by Doing very actionable, in this interesting article (“Why Use Interactive Storytelling in Training: Benefits of Role Plays”) that I recommend if you would like to learn more about how interaction and narrative put together can deliver great results.

 

In general, most businesses are aware that the more experience an employee has with a given situation, the more effective he is in that situation. It would seem to follow, therefore, that the best way to teach anybody is to let them work on a job that requires the skills we are trying to teach.

This is a bit circular since it means letting an employee attempt to use skills that we know he doesn’t have in order to teach him those skills.

The best way to learn how to do a job is to simply try doing the job, with no preparation in particular, but with an expert available for help as needed to provide consistent feedback.

 

Also, several theories suggest that the implementation of simulation-led training strategies perfectly fit the adult need of learning by experience.
In the following image, I mention only a few, but if you are interested in delving deeper into the subject, take a look at this interesting article (“From Critical to Empowering Conversations: Let’s Change the World Using the C-FACTOR”).

 

All in all, what matters is that Digital Role Play perfectly fits with the idea of providing learning strategies based on experiential learning.

 

What does the word “Digital” add to traditional Role Plays?

Let’s focus now on the meaning of the word “DIGITAL” to see what the “old” and the “new” have in common and how they evolved.

 

 

As a main characteristic, you would expect that your trainee interacts with a digital or virtual character through a screen. Instead of sitting in front of you while both of you play one role in the conversation in real time.

Then of course, another feature you would expect from a Digital Role Play is that the trainee will play alone, without the need for you to attend or participate during the conversation.

This is very important for at least two reasons:

  • It reduces the stress of being ‘watched,’ and
  • It allows to plan for multiple sessions in a scalable way

 

Another important feature that you may expect are more or less sophisticated algorithms controlling the interaction and thus, adding a life-like flavor to the experience in terms of the level of realistic unpredictability of the situation.

Finally, since it is digital, this tool would normally track the interaction thus providing you, as a L&D department, the option of monitoring ongoing practice while being able to review both the effort spent and the results achieved.

 

 

Digital Role Plays perform better than traditional ones

As explored in detail in this article (“Digital Role Plays, the Best Way to Develop Conversational Leadership”) Digital Role Plays introduce five benefits in the application of Role Play techniques that are not available when practicing in traditional face-to-face scenarios:

1. Consistency of practical training
Behavioral changes require times and consistent practice. DRP platforms make it sustainable from an economic and logistic points of view.

2. Scalability
Everyone deserves the opportunity to improve. DRP offers the application of the effective “Learning by Doing” approach to all the employees in a very immediate and manageable way.

3. Metric driven
DRP solutions provide a set of homogenous and unbiased behavioral metrics for the entire learners’ community. It allows L&D professionals to have a complete picture in order to set objectives and design specific actions where required.

4. Self-awareness through conversation review
Having the opportunity of self-reflection is a key element in personal development. The best Digital Role Play allows the learner to play back the performed sessions, adding additional behavioral insights to build internal and external self-awareness.

5. Safe environment
DRP solutions make trainees feel “safer” than when they play a traditional role play. In fact, they remove that feeling of “being judged during confrontation”, which can embarrass and even block some people, in favor of a more natural way to express themselves in the role play session.

 

The way in which a Digital Role Play platform is normally designed is a primary reason for these benefits.
In fact, each of the following seven components delivers a specific piece of the entire experience:

 

 

 

  1. A way to schedule the exercise in advance
  2. Somewhere for your trainees to prepare for the context
  3. An area to play the role play in a manner that makes it as interactive as possible
  4. A moment to reflect on one’s own performance before receiving feedback
  5. The possibility to debrief and learn from the experience through emotional feedback
  6. A set of measurable metrics
  7. The possibility to review the Digital Role Play to take a closer look at the action after the feedback has been delivered

Let’s explore each element in detail.

 

1. The scheduling system

One key characteristic of a Digital Role Play is the way users can schedule their training activity.
Automatic scheduling minimizes the organizational impact, while increasing the emotional engagement and commitment of users towards the scheduled individual training program:

 

  • Once the individual training path is defined, the platform sends to the user periodic Doodle Invitations to schedule Role Plays
  • The user chooses the date and time of the meeting and an appointment is scheduled on the calendar, just like for real life meetings
  • The platform sends reminders to the user as the appointment approaches and, in case of late show or cancellation, a reminder is sent

 

People are so used to sticking to their calendar that the simple fact of scheduling one life-like meeting makes trainees more prone to being disciplined about their training. There is a scientific basis to this. As you surely know, numerous scientific studies have demonstrated that our brain does not differentiate between real life and simulation.

In this article (“Three Case Studies and One Strategy to Keep Users Engaged with Digital Learning”) I explore through several case studies on the impact of this specific component in terms of trainee engagement.

 

2. A preparation room

As you know, one important part of any role play is providing enough background about the scenario that is going to be played so that trainees can figure out their own role, the scope of the exercise and some additional elements upon which to define a strategy.

 

 

Digital Role Plays need to provide at least the same elements. And the complexity of a human-to-human conversation should be reflected in the availability of details such as:

  • Who is the character, including his social background, his personality and approach and his hierarchy of needs
  • Where and why the conversation should take place: where it is physically set, what role the trainee is going to play and other details about the context, such as the scope of the conversation and any intermediate goals to be achieved
  • And finally provide enough elements to understand what type of behaviors will be tested, assessed and measured

This allows you to deliver a tool so that your trainees can prepare before they play the interaction.

 

3. The interactive area

Once trainees start the Digital Role Play (and what you see here is just one example of the many user interfaces available on the market), you would normally face a one-to-one conversational situation in which the character is sitting in front of them, resembling what would be the user experience during a real role play.

The setting can vary and, as we said before, you may face a puppet (either cartoon or 3D model) or a human being filmed in video.

 

 

The way trainees usually interact is by selecting options on the screen representing things they can say. Each sentence represents an observable behavior and allows for the flow of the conversation to follow one’s own style and topics.

 

Here you may find Digital Role Plays based on branching techniques, and in that case each option is hard wired with the correspondent reaction of the character or, in other cases, more sophisticated solutions based on AI algorithms and machine learning, where the connection between the options and the reactions is less predictable (more on this at the end of this article).

On average, you should expect a Digital Role Play to last between 10 to 15 minutes of seamless real-time interaction.
This is normally what you would also expect from a traditional role play.

 

4. Self-Evaluation

At the end of the interactive session, it is very important to let users reflect on their own performance before they receive feedback.

This is not just for training, it should happen in real life too, but we know how difficult it is.

 

 

In this area, the Digital Role Play provides a list of questions to reflect on. They can be either standard questions or related to the specific action just played.

In either case, it is a useful time for users to stop the action and take a breath while reflecting on their conversation.
The score with which they rate their performance will normally influence one key score called Self-Awareness.

 

5. Feedback

The most powerful, still not analytical, feedback that a Digital Role Play can provide to users is the warm, direct, personal, emotional opinion of the characters themselves.

When detailed with specific examples on what actually happened during the conversation, it will provide a very powerful indication about the connections between causes and effects.

 

 

We all know how difficult it is to figure out what the other person thinks or, more so, what the other person will do after completing the conversation with them. Receiving elements about how they lived the experience provides very important clues that will prove as experience accelerators in Learning by Doing.

I recommend reviewing this article (“Why Stimulate Self-Awareness by Using Both Sides of Your Brain?”) to discover more about why it is important to trigger both sides of the brain, providing both emotional and analytical feedback to the trainee.

 

6. Measurable metrics

The next way to provide feedback by showing meaningful metrics. Most Digital Role Play platforms have several ways to measure how the performance was influenced by behaviors and how behaviors developed and moved through the conversation.

 

 

Generally speaking, it is quite interesting to provide a blend of elements ranging from the general performance (answering the question: “How successful was this conversation?”) down to more detailed elements such as the flow of the communication process, the coherence of the negotiation strategy and the blend of competencies used along the way to ensure effective communication between parties.

 

It is also important to track certain metrics related to the discipline of training. In this article (“8 Key Metrics to Ensure a Successful Practical Training on Critical Conversations”) I explore the eight fundamental metrics (four related to results and four to discipline) that I consider paramount to track when designing a successful conversational leadership training program.

 

7. A way to review the experience

Finally, the best digital role play platforms provide a way to review the entire conversation. The idea is to attend and listen to the action from a third-party position in order to review the performance and reflect on details.

 

 

 

Typically, the two main things that one user may want to review are:

  1. On one side, their own behaviors as applied along the way. Imagine a way to review each sentence, identify the underlying predominant behaviors and rate their application in terms of quality (with some evidence of what other ways were available to deal with that specific step of the conversation).
  2. On the other side, the character’s body language. This is one of the main challenges for most everyone: recognizing other people’s body language. The most advanced Digital Role Play platform allows for this feature.

 

Key learning triggers

A Digital Role Play triggers the trainees along the entire immersive and interactive experience, not just at the end of the interactive part, thus providing a multi-channel and multi-strategy way to learn and improve soft skills.

There are at least eight types of learning triggers generated through the training experience and all of them are based on experiential learning (more in this article “8 Ways Your Skills Will Improve by Practicing on Digital Role Plays”):

 

 

  • The counterpart body language
  • The counterpart emotional reactions
  • Objective measurement
  • The acquisition of a communication process
  • The real-time impact of the cause-effect of communication
  • The challenge to achieve smart goals
  • A sense of Deja-vu, which corresponds to the feeling of “I was here before, I know what to expect”, and
  • The opportunity to critically review the performance

 

Learning benefits from the combination of these triggers: trainees activate both the rational and the emotional learning mechanisms.

This article (“How Practicing on Digital Role Play Improves Performance: a Case Study”) shows a very interesting case study of how these learning triggers put together delivered amazing improvement in the conversational performance of a large group of sales people.

 

It is very important to underscore, however, that the way you design the training program matters a lot.

This article (“SkillGym Digital Fitness: Pure, Adaptive Leadership Training”) explores the subject of how adaptive learning applied to Digital Role Play can make a huge difference in the way people learn and change their behaviors.

 

The new frontier of AI

The large majority of Digital Role Plays are still designed using very simple branching techniques, where each choice of the user leads to one pre-determined reaction from the simulation.

 

Unfortunately, this choice, while being quite inexpensive to implement results in overly basic results. In real life, we do not interact in such a simple way.
Each decision we make and every emotion we express are the results of multiple factors merging, making the possible nuances of our behaviors almost unlimited.

There are several good reasons for considering the implementation of AI-based solutions, including a much more authentic trainee experience; I discuss this intriguing subject in-depth in this article (“How AI Helps Delivering a Better SkillGym Training Experience”).

 

Where to go from here

You may now be interested in learning more about tips to select your next Digital Role Play system. At the bottom of the following article (“Digital Role Plays, the Best Way to Develop Conversational Leadership”) I provide you with a detailed checklist about what to look at when deciding on which platform to adopt.

It is also very important to reflect on how to integrate Digital Role Play into your existing strategy, since too often these types of tools are just placed at the end of a classic course for a quick “follow-up” that, most of the time, does not add any value, which results in underutilization of the enormous power and potential of these kinds of solutions.

 

Read this article (“Flipping the Leadership Development Strategy with Actionable and Scalable Programs”) to learn more about the best way to truly integrate Digital Role Plays into your L&D strategy.

Finally, if you are interested in discovering how we here at SkillGym deliver the best in class Digital Role Plays, feel free to book a 1-hour discovery call.

I hope you enjoyed the ride!

 

Leave a Reply

A Curriculum for Conversational Leadership

 

Conversational Leadership is gaining daily in popularity. And there is a good reason for that.

Conversations are the energizing fuel of leadership, even if organizations sometimes discover this the hard way, when Leaders underperform in their duties of motivating, leading and supporting employees through this important asset.
The old saying, “people don’t leave bad companies, they leave bad bosses” remains true.

 

The need to create more inclusive and more motivating organizations is one of the reasons why, clearly, we need more and better performing Leaders. Also, we need to take into account the fact that our society as a whole is developing so fast that old patterns and old references get obsolete at a much higher pace.

It is very urgent to cope with this continuous change by developing a new generation of Leaders.

New Leaders who, at different levels of any organizational ladder, can provide support to a more inspired, stable and purpose-driven ensemble of employees. It’s not surprising then to see the rising interest in the potential that hides behind Conversational Leadership mastery.

 

However, in witnessing the growing development of Conversational Leadership literature, such as books, articles, webinars and the like, too many organizations are still facing the dilemma of how to integrate effective training to support development in a smart way.

In fact, most of the available literature covers the topics of Conversational Leadership and critical conversations in a very cognitive way, providing best practices to rapidly approach most tough situations, but fails to deliver an appropriate and comprehensive program to train the underlying skills required to master this area of leadership in the long term.

 

Developing leadership, and specifically on Conversational Leadership, requires more than a general vision of the subject and a list of best-practice tips to be applied as needed to some of the most common difficult situations.

Conversations involve behaviors that are highly dependent on habits. Simply knowing what to do, or even how to do it, does not provide enough foundation to act in a way to influence behaviors and, in the long run, to change old and underperforming habits.

 

If your goal is to establish a robust structure for Conversational Leadership empowerment, you can’t just rely on framing the issue of “critical conversations” as something you solve with some best-practices and deliver a few days of class to just let your trainees know how they should cope with it.

And you absolutely can’t leave them unsupported afterwards, when they need to find out how to turn such knowledge into habit-driven new behaviors and how to keep the balance between the different leadership situations they face every day.

 

Instead, you need to consider addressing the entire subject in a smarter and more structured way.

To succeed, you need to implement a comprehensive training program based on actionable practice and nothing is better than Digital Role Play as a powerful integration of any preliminary formal education.
However, in order to deliver it the right way, there are at least two ingredients that need to be analyzed in-depth and carefully implemented.

 

The first ingredient is the training methodology itself.

Since this is not the focus of this article, I recommend reading at least the following three articles, for a comprehensive conceptual coverage of this important ingredient:

 

The second ingredient is a comprehensive Curriculum: one strategic plan based on a consistent vision, outlining all the elements required to cover not just the shortcuts, but also and mainly, the real pillars of sustainable skill set development.

The goal can’t be “fixing the issue” with some recommendations and a low-actionable formal class once in a while.
The outline of a proper Curriculum is instead the foreword to the delivery of a structured and credible solution for the long-lasting development of confidence in conversations and of self-awareness of Leaders in their own skills and potential.

 

So, when you look at consistent practice-oriented training programs, made of scenarios covering the full spectrum of possible situations to practice with, make sure you double check the consistency of the following elements influencing the good application of Conversational Leadership skills:

  1. Areas of leadership empowerment upon which to develop conversational mastery
  2. Leadership values around those areas, to make sure that the training delivers skills aligned with and respecting key values
  3. Types of conversations to practice with that cover the four areas of empowerment
  4. Topics that these conversations can address
  5. Types of people (“characters”) with whom the conversation, whatever it is, may take place
  6. Styles of leadership to apply
  7. Skills to train to master conversational leadership

 

The intersection of these “building blocks” defines not only the different situations with which it makes sense to practice and the type of training that should be covered by the program, but also the kind of elements that require measurement for monitoring improvements in performance and the overall result of the entire program.

Clearly, one thing is delivering general (although smart) knowledge about how to deal with critical conversations, another is to cover all the building blocks of a complete curriculum, set up a measurement system and deploy a consistent schedule for integrated practice.

Let’s delve deeper and see how these building blocks relate to each other and how they can be the best foundation of an amazing and comprehensive training program on Conversational Leadership.

 

1. Areas of leadership empowerment

The first founding pillar of a training curriculum on Conversational Leadership should answer the question: what areas of leadership influence can be covered through conversations?
It’s a very important question.

I frequently see that the subject is dealt with using a very tactical approach, by listing a number of “difficult” conversations as they come to mind. However, the list of conversations should be the last step in a more in-depth analysis.

 

Starting the reflection by identifying the main areas of leadership empowerment is a much better way to proceed.
Incidentally, this element can be considered cross-culture and generally applicable to all types of organizations.

Even though the mix can vary slightly, I would recommend the following and well-balanced short-list of empowering areas:

  • Lead. This is the key area of empowerment of Leaders. It’s where conversations can drive action and solve potential issues.
  • Inspire. This area is the foreword of any engagement. People want to be part of something and inspiring conversations are the means to bring them in.
  • Support. Once employees are in the field, they expect Leaders to support them. Either because they ask for support or because their Leaders understand it’s time to nudge them.
  • Discover. Reciprocal discovery conversations allow Leaders to remove blind spots and be fully aligned with the reality.

In my experience, these are the core areas upon which it makes sense to design any training program on Conversational Leadership.

 

2. Leadership values

Before starting to play with conversational tips and tricks, it is essential to ensure that any technique, shortcuts and recommendations are aligned to a set of values that reflect the organization’s goals.

This interesting article by Jim Collins sets forth some important considerations on the importance of aligning actions with value.
The questions you should ask yourself are: does the curriculum you are referring to sound grounded in terms of value? Do those values reflect your values? To what extent?

 

It’s very important because if you value honesty, for instance, you can’t support a conversational technique that involves hiding unpleasant truths.
And if you value being humble, you can’t incorporate a conversational approach based on cocky and arrogant directions.

Whatever the conversation, whatever the topic, whoever the counterpart: stay true to your core values. Always.

 

3. Types of conversations

Let’s face it: there are so many types of conversations to train in, that you can’t work out on all of them in one lifetime. So, you’d better plan smart.
Go for the great classic 80/20 approach and select the most important types of each area of empowerment.

You don’t need to cover all types of conversations.

They are too many and, most of all, the majority are either not as critical as they seem (at least in terms of real impact on results and performance) or they do not happen frequently enough to justify focusing your training program on it.

At the same time, please steer clear of “one approach solves all”. It’s not like that. Although I would agree that some general techniques can be applied all the time, practicing with a type of conversation means gaining experience with that specific type of conversation, which is different from any other.

 

I would recommend selecting 3-4 types of conversations for each empowerment area. To make sure you cover what’s really needed.

A good approach can be that of dividing the types of conversations in groups, such as:

  • Conversations happening frequently and/or pushing things forward
  • Conversations happening less frequently, but necessary for setting the grounds for better performance
  • Other types of conversations that can make a difference when things get really though

 

4. Topics

Don’t get confused here. Topics and types of conversations are not the same thing.
A type of conversation can be, for instance, giving feedback (I would connect this between the Lead and the Inspire areas of empowerment and I would group it within those conversations happening less frequently, but necessary for setting the foundation for better performance); a topic for this type of conversation could be the performance, attitude or a recent accident, etc.

 

Each type of conversation includes an abundance of possible topics, which is why.

However, topics are very important to consider in one curriculum since they are one of the key elements toward turning a type of conversation (which is a conceptual thing) into a situation (which is a much more practical thing and that can be addressed with practical training by means of role playing and/or digital role playing for training conversational skills).

 

A good way to make order of topics is to organize them with a matrix that considers:

  • On one dimension, the scope of dealing with that topic. To be very straightforward, here I would recommend the scope being either to review (something happened in the past) or to plan (something for the future).
    Of course, each topic can carry (and usually it does) a piece of both. However, this classification is useful to select truly actionable topics.
  • On the second dimension, the domain in which that topic is set. Here I would recommend distinguishing between performance/results (very objective) and relationship/approach (the subjective side).
    Again, very actionable.

 

So, for example, you may want to focus part of the training on the area of Support, addressing a type of conversation dealing with Ease the Change by discussing the topic of Discrimination for the scope of planning a new approach in the relationship/approach domain.

Whatever the case and the example, this approach to curriculum planning will ensure you define a proper pathway designed with clear directions in mind.

 

5. Types of people

One of the factors in turning a conceptual type of conversation (i.e. “delegate”) into a trainable situation, is the type of person the conversation is done with. Of course, you can’t design a conversational training program that includes practicing with any and all human beings on earth.

That’s why you need to select a limited range of “characters” that makes sense to practice with. Again, the 80/20 principle can help here.
Some types of characters are more “interesting” than others to play with.

 

The key criteria of selection here could possibly be:

  • How common that character is, so what are the odds of facing that character in our next critical conversation
  • How difficult it is to deal with such character once the conversation is started

 

Of course, the selection needs to consider several elements such as: the way characters think, the way they behave and the way they communicate.
There are several models to define the key traits that determine the way in which people deal with conversations.

This article (“Building Authentic Characters for Effective Digital Role Plays”) outlines the most widely used and I would recommend using more than one model at the same time, to make sure you have a broader vision of the different aspects to consider.

 

6. Leadership styles

There is no such thing as one leadership style fitting all the situations. Each situation requires the application of a specific leadership style in order to achieve the best effects in terms of conversational outcome.

So, you should carefully connect the dots between the above elements of the curriculum that lead to different “situations” and make sure that each situation is then dealt with using the appropriate style of leadership.

 

This is a key step. Much too often I hear about things like “we have our own leadership style, coherent with our internal culture”. But the point is that no absolute approach is really performing at all the times.

Instead, it makes sense to say “we have our own competency model” (see this article “Making a Competency Model Truly Actionable in People’s Development” for an interesting discussion about this subject) and, from time to time, we support a different leadership style to adapt according to the specific conversation.

And the specific conversation is the result of a situation which is the result of a mix of elements as described above.
Here is where you get the full potential of reasoning in terms of Conversational Leadership curriculum.

 

There are several leadership models defined as “styles” using different approaches that a Leader should take when dealing with a situation. Pick one, but make sure you make an informed decision.

If I were to recommend one, I would definitely say Emotional Leadership and I would suggest exploring the 6 styles that make up a very comprehensive canvas of different approaches (this topic is well covered by this article “Using Situational Leadership to Manage Different Types of Conversations”).

 

7. Skills

Sometimes I see a certain degree of confusion around the subject of competency and skills mapping.

This article (“Making a Competency Model Truly Actionable in People’s Development”) specifically addresses the topic and shows how to connect the dots (and most importantly, how to relate the abstract concept of “competency model” to the more practical and actionable concept of “learning-by-doing” training).

 

With that clarification of which is which in the competency domain, I recommend sticking to a very well-structured skill set both for the design of the entire training program and for the selection of each scenario of practical training.

Conversational Leadership development is about behavior development and behaviors are the building blocks of skills.
Therefore, it is very important to choose wisely.

 

Where to go from here

While reading these lines, you are probably planning or working on a training program about leadership. So, I hope I was able to deliver on the following:

  • Conversational Leadership is increasingly becoming a part of the picture, which brings with it new challenges on the design side
  • Working from the perspective of a well-structured curriculum is necessary to ensure consistency and measurability
  • Since Conversational Leadership is acquired mostly through practical training, and since practical training in Conversational Leadership is best delivered through Digital Role Play, relying on a solid curriculum is the best way to approach the world of Digital Role Play design or selection

 

Most likely you will want to select a ready-made Digital Role Play solution, rather than building one from scratch.

In fact, creating Digital Role Plays is costly and time consuming and there are several solutions on the market that can well-fit your needs.

 

There are two articles I would recommend you read on these two topics:

 

I hope this article was useful. I would welcome the opportunity to continue this conversation if you would like to comment below.

Of course, we would be delighted to show you SkillGym’s solution in a 1-hour discovery call.

Leave a Reply

The True Learning Scope Behind a Digital Role Play

 

For several years, I took part in projects for creating custom-made Digital Role Plays for large organizations. Most of the time, the need expressed by the client was that of delivering a meaningful way to practice critical conversations.
From time to time, it could be about practicing on pitching to prospects, solving clients’ issues over the phone or motivating and driving a team.

 

Very frequently, however, despite the client’s initial commitment to deliver a real opportunity to practice conversational skills, the outcome of the project ended up in one scenario that looked like:

  • The Digital Role Play was designed with the specific purpose of instructing the trainee on a script. Rather than delivering a true experiential journey into the different nuances of how communication can develop between two individuals, the goal became that of making sure that every single detail of the sales script (or the customer-care or the management) was polished and crystal clear to the trainee, including the last minute (and not so long-lasting) slogans as well as product-related examples (which were then expected to be perfectly memorized)
  • The schedule of practicing was limited to a few weeks, normally an intensive “boot camp” after the end of a 2-day traditional class on the same subject
  • Trainees were asked to play either as much as possible or a certain (high) number of interviews, with the explicit goal of crossing a specific and high threshold of score to reach some sort of “certifiable” status
  • The entire program was promoted as something in between an innovative follow-up and an “urgent” full-immersion in the to-be-learned selling model (or customer care or management)
  • No strategy of active engagement was previewed, leaving the trainees to self-organize their own schedule of usage

 

At that point, almost every single time I witnessed the following, typical reactions by the trainees.

Given the freshness of the digital experience, at the beginning trainees were well engaged in the new exercise. The fact that they could see their own situations (types of clients and also references to their real context) made the initial approach even sweeter, since they saw an opportunity to try out things that they would not dare to do and say in real life with their real clients.

 

However, after the first few days of engagement, the following happened, almost all the time:

  • Trainees started to argue about the contents of the simulation. On one side, the fact that the scenarios were designed to reproduce as much as possible their reality put them in a defensive approach and unleashed all the possible critical remarks, especially since the declared scope of the training was that of “scoring high” (read: selecting the best performers).
    So, among the others, the comments were about: “There was no option for what I would have said”, “My real client is not like that”, “Why can’t I say what I really want”, “Why can’t I talk instead of choosing among written options”, “I cannot show my tone and gestures” and so on.
  • At the same time, since the scope of the program was that of instructing on a given script, all the options of interaction apart the right script were very trivial and excessively easy to spot as the wrong choices. So, the trainees started to lose interest in the game very early on, since it was not really challenging their abilities.
  • The mandatory nature of the program, added to the freedom of self-organization, lead to disorganized schedules. Most trainees rushed to play all the interviews near to the deadline, basically dispensing with the idea of consistency in training, which is what makes the exercise valuable because it is well-distributed in time just like training for a sport.

 

The results are easy to imagine.

In the best-case scenario, some trainees learned the script and performed a little better than usual, but just for as long as they could remember it and until a new script arrived to replace the old one.
The large majority of them though, did not receive any advantage from this training approach and, moreover, started to consider this solution as a waste of time. Believe me, I would have agreed with them.

However, the key design issues of such a program are not related to the type of tool/solution. It’s never a problem of the tool itself in these cases.

Rather it’s about the scope of the program, the duration, the contents stuffed inside the tool and the way it is presented and promoted among users that can turn a great learning strategy into a miserable fail.

 

What makes a Digital Role Play a great learning strategy?

So, let’s restart from the beginning. Let’s say you are on your first date with Digital Role Play as a trainer.
You have maybe read something about this solution on a blog or heard about it from a fellow colleague. And you are considering giving it a try for your next soft-skill learning program, whatever it is about.

Well, before dressing up for the date, let’s take a look at how you should treat a Digital Role Play in terms of integration in any learning program and what you should expect from a Digital Role Play when treated the right way.

 

Understanding the real nature of a Digital Role Play (DRP, for friends) is as easy as counting to three:

1) First of all, DRP it is not a way to instruct trainees on scripts. It does not make any sense for several reasons.
First, scripts change frequently, and you can’t afford to change the contents of DRP at that frequency (at least in good or very good ones, which doesn’t include the home-made, easy-branched, puppet-style ones, by the way).
Second, people hate to memorize scripts; don’t try to ask them to, it’s a waste of time.
Third, scripts never match reality: real life always overcomes fantasy, there’s no match; sorry if that sounds rude.

On the contrary, training on DRP is a way to let trainees experience different shades of communication and to let them feel the way the counterpart reacts. It’s about making an experience in communication, whatever the subject as long as the type of conversation, the key communication behaviors and the appropriate style are there to practice with.

 

2) It’s not about intensive practice. You don’t get fit going to a gym for two weeks eight hours a day.
That the way it end up at the ER (and it does not take two weeks). Digital Role Plays work best when they work on changing habits. To change a habit, you need consistent repetition spread over months, not just few weeks.
It’s not about quantity of repetition, it’s about consistency of repetitions at a balanced pace.

 

3) It’s not about scoring high, it’s about scoring wide. Much too often, I see trainers (as well as line managers involved in the training design!) setting high score thresholds to be met in exchange of “certification”.
Again, this approach involves instructing based on a script that trainees will never have the chance to pitch in full in real life. Scoring wide, instead, means experimenting with the different nuances of the conversation to gain experience with what-happens-if, whatever happens, including mistakes.
Of course, this requires a perfect design of the “wrong” side of the conversation as well, which is instead normally left out when the “script” is the focus.

 

So, when you start forgetting about instructing and you start focusing on real practicing, that’s where a Digital Role Play can become your best ally in delivering real conversational, actionable training.

In fact, a DRP becomes really powerful when it allows trainees to:

  • Directly experience the cause-effect connections in a dialogue, especially when they reflect the real-time impact of the flow of the conversation, showing the emotions, the reactions and the way the counterparts communicate when triggered with different stimuli.
  • Develop the so-called “Deja-vu” of those experiences. Each time you live one significant and emotional experience, a little bit of it gets stored in your brain (in the so-called “working memory”). And the more it is associated with basic emotions, such as fear, anxiety, astonishment, sense of reward and so on, the more any recalling of it will trigger the fast-reacting basic instincts controlled by our amygdala.
    The consistent storage of different experiences, in the form of brain-digestible images, related to the same emotion contributes to the development of those Deja-vu moments that are so helpful in making us react quickly when it’s needed (more on this in a minute).
  • Develop self-awareness through continuous confrontation between the self-perception of one’s own performance and the unbiased feedback provided by the counterpart. The best Digital Role Plays are capable of delivering both emotional and analytical feedbacks, thus triggering both sides of the brain (this article “Why Stimulate Self-Awareness by Using Both Sides of Your Brain?” is a great source of inspiration on the specific subject of leveraging both sides of the brain to accelerate experiential learning and develop self-awareness).

 

More on developing experience-based fast reactions

The recent development of neurosciences is increasingly validating the importance of training through emotional triggers. Joseph LeDoux, an American neuroscientist whose research is primarily focused on survival circuits, including their impacts on emotions such as fear and anxiety clearly says, “Fear and anxiety are not biologically wired… They are the consequence of the cognitive process”.

The concept of emotional experiences as triggers for developing faster reactions in human behavior is very fascinating.

 

Certainly, the recent development of neurosciences confirms the validity of the importance of developing experience-based fast reactions. It also provides several explanations about why it is not that important for the content and the setting of the simulation perfectly reflect your corporate environment and culture.

What is really important is that the simulation allows for a wide practice of different cultural and conversational approaches in front of different types of individuals, moved by different needs and acting according to different triggers as suggested by the most reputable psychometrics models.

 

That’s where real experience is acquired and that’s where a Digital Role Play can deliver the best ROI, by accelerating the formation of such experience and by helping to store it in trainees’ brains in the form of emotionally lived situations or “Deja-vu”.

When a Digital Role Play is well-designed, those Deja-vu moments become an immediate source of best-practice application during Critical Conversations that matter.

Now it’s time to review which ingredients are necessary to get the best results.

 

When Digital Role Plays become great Digital Role Plays

There are, in my experience, seven key ingredients to be included in the design, development and delivery of a great Digital Role Play training program. They are:

  1. Be extremely life-like. Experiences get fixed as living images when they are lived in real. A simulation gets as close to reality the more it shows reality. So, I recommend discarding puppet and 3D avatar solutions, and rely instead on professional actors.
  2. Rely on strong psychometric and behavioral models to ensure that the storytelling is accurate and truly delivering the real emotions, reactions, feelings and wording of those characters. Models such as DiSC, HBDI and MBTI work very well, alone and together (more in this article “Building Authentic Characters for Effective Digital Role Plays”).
  3. Make sure the interaction is not deterministic. You need to immerse your trainees in the flow of the dialogue. This is a very important point, please read this article (“How AI Helps Delivering a Better SkillGym Training Experience”) to get the full picture.
  4. Don’t work on “scripts”, but rather keep the story decontextualized. Your trainees are not monkeys, and they don’t like to be instructed.
    They can learn much more by making mistakes than by memorizing your favorite pitch. What really matters is not what they say during the conversation, but how well they are prepared to face the reactions of their counterparts (and how well they can read them through the unspoken language).
    More on storytelling in this article (“Why Use Interactive Storytelling in Training: Benefits of Role Plays”).
  5. Use both emotional and analytical feedback. Don’t rely just on one of the two approaches, make sure our brain works in full when turning experiences into lessons.
  6. Tell your trainees about this article. Let them know the hows and whys of their training, let them know what type of exercise will help them and how. People need a useful purpose to be motivated to learn, so please don’t go for useless (though well-hyped) things like #gamifications, #leaderboards and #high-scoring if they are not really connected to allow true (and also mistake-driven) learning experience.
  7. Make space. Instead of setting up shockingly intensive boot camp over few weeks where people get literally overwhelmed by practice and consequently stock all the activity at the very end, make sure they are not rushed.
    Give them time (months, not weeks), give them an adaptive plan (read this article “SkillGym Digital Fitness: Pure, Adaptive Leadership Training” to learn more about the power of adapting learning) and make sure they are well engaged along the way (more on smart engagement in this article “Three Case Studies and One Strategy to Keep Users Engaged with Digital Learning”).

 

Awaking the giant

When those ingredients come together, the real power of a strategy based on actionable training shows up, making conversational leadership development really deliver.

This type of Digital Role Play is capable of turning the simulated experience into vivid and living images in our brains. They become powerful Deja-vus, triggering our amygdala by basic and instinctive emotions much faster than any other rational stimuli can do.

 

This is how we react when we drive our car and something unexpected happens in front of us. We don’t think, we just react at light speed, applying instinctively a previously stored strategy that comes from previously lived experiences.
The trick is to make sure that we store very effective experiences, and this can be done through well-designed simulation as indicated above.

It’s a totally different way, and much more effective, to reach the desired goal that many trainers still think can be reached by forcing trainees to learn scripts. It’s still about creating automatisms, however, in a way that truly works for our brains, which is that of living real (or life-like) experiences and not that of parroting a pre-cooked pitch.

 

The result of practicing at the right pace in experiences that allow to mistakes to be made and that generate living images in our brain (the so-called Deja-vu) is the formation of our habits. This is a key point:

  • Each of us already acts on habits. We rely on our habits when we enter a learning class
  • The scope of training should be that of improving those habits
  • This does not happen by simply explaining how we should behave, and not even by instructing us on how we should do
  • The only chance is to allow trainees to practice in a safe environment, without biasing them with pre-determined “winning” paths. Let them fail, provide them with instant feedback (more on the amazing learning triggers of best the Digital Role Plays in this article “8 Ways Your Skills Will Improve by Practicing on Digital Role Plays”) and wait for the formation of new and better performing habits

 

These are some of the reasons why I am a big fan of the idea of totally flipping those training strategies that don’t consider practical training or just keep it relegated at the end of traditional classes (more on the idea of flipping conversational training strategies in this amazing article “Flipping the Leadership Development Strategy with Actionable and Scalable Programs”).

 

Routing the learning experience

Great Digital Role Plays develop powerful dialogues by presenting ready-made options to the trainees, each carrying a specific shade of a specific behavior. And the dialogue is written in a way (we call it a meta-narrative) that the readers can imagine the entire emotional impact of such a sentence in their mind.

 

There are some important implications behind this strategy:

  1. First, uninformed trainees (and trainers as well, sometimes) claim that the Digital Role Play should let the users freely say what they want. Well, on one side we observed that when they are left to say what they want, they end up not knowing what to say.
    And by the way, allow me this joke, I used to argue that, “If they were enrolled in a conversational leadership program, it is likely because what they normally say is not that effective”.
  2. Then, I am sure you watched a movie based on a book you loved. And I am sure your reaction was, “The book was much better”.
    Why? Because the book was written in a way (meta-narrative) that allowed your brain to conjure up your own flavors and shades of behaviors played by the characters.
    And, of course, it was your way, the best possible means of triggering your deep-rooted emotions. Again, when we move from fiction to training, there are ways to write the options of a simulated dialogue that trigger the right emotions and resemble in our mind the right behaviors that cause certain precise character reactions.
    That’s the reason why you don’t need to talk to the simulation to express your intentions (you need to show your body language in front of the camera).
  3. Finally, don’t forget it’s a training, not just “free experience”. So, it is paramount to make sure that the user gets routed into a certain path of allowed experiences, allowing them to experiment without limits within that range.

 

Let me add one more thing. Digital Role Playing is not about learning what to say and how to say and how to gesture when saying it. Digital Role Playing, to be really effective, is about learning what happens when you do that (which, as stated above, does not require gestures or shouts).

And the more this type of learning is acquired through consistent and unrushed practice, the more it turns into living (and light-speed actionable) images in our brain.

 

The more the training experience alternates different situations (i.e., different plots, different types of conversations and different types of characters), the more the overlapping living images, the more the Deja-vus, the more efficient our basic and instinctive reactions during real life conversations.

This is why I always say that in a well-designed Digital Role Play there are no right or wrong options for the trainee to choose. They are all right choices because it’s not about scoring high, but wide.

The more the trainees can experiment, the more they will make of the training experience.

 

How long does it take?

As I wrote above, one of the key ingredients of a successful practical training on soft skills, in particular on conversational leadership, is about not rushing the trainees to complete a certain (high) number of simulations in a very short period (weeks).

However, you may argue that the time allowed for training (especially corporate training) is measured in days, weeks maximum, not months.

 

Let’s reflect on this. It is not necessarily true that an established practice is a good practice and you do not necessarily need to monopolize the trainees’ time to deliver effective and consistent soft-skill long-haul training:

  • On the first point, can you imagine professional athletes getting trained once or two times per year in a 2-day class with some exercise at the end? How could they possibly perform at the Olympic games with such a poor training strategy? I am sure you agree with me, so far.
    Now think about the Leaders in your organization (or the salespeople or the customer care staff, it’s just the same). Aren’t you (and your entire organization) calling them to win the gold medal at your Olympic games (in other words, winning the next big contract, keeping your clients loyal for life or spreading your well-designed corporate culture)?
    So, why should they be prepared for that challenge with such a poor training strategy as the pit-stop learning activities? (Yes, that’s what the 2-days class + some exercise really are). Food for thought here.

 

  • On the second point, if you really think that in the 21st century you really need to monopolize the entire agenda of your trainees to deliver effective and consistent long-haul training, please read this article (“Three Case Studies and One Strategy to Keep Users Engaged with Digital Learning”).
    Scheduling effective simulation-based, actionable training is much easier than you think. Evidence shows that it takes less than one hour / month to develop and maintain conversational skills (because you need to maintain them as well). And after just 3-4 months, results are stunning (all in the case study described in the article linked above, which is worth reading).

 

Kudos to you for reading this far. I know it was long, but I hope it was worth it. There is really so much to do to make soft skill training great and I hope this article gave you some elements of reflection.

I would love to hear from you, so feel free to comment below or to contact me directly. Also, if you are curious about how we develop Digital Role Plays that really perform, give us a shout and book a 1-hour discovery call of our tools.

Have a great day.

Leave a Reply

Self-Awareness: the Single Factor Influencing the Speed of Leadership Development

 

In a recent article (“8 Key Metrics to Ensure a Successful Practical Training on Critical Conversations”), I wrote about the eight key metrics that L&D strategies should focus on when designing a leadership training program aimed at developing conversational leadership.

Being all equal, however, years of in-field experience about leadership development suggest to me that if I had to choose one and only one, I would definitely go for developing Self-Awareness.

Let’s take a look at how Self-Awareness influences the pace of development of leadership skills.

 

Measuring Self-Awareness with Digital Role Plays

There are several ways to assess Self-Awareness, most of them being based on questionnaires and 360-degree reviews of leadership effectiveness.

Since I consider Self-Awareness as one of the most important metrics of our practical conversational leadership training, so I have developed a very interesting method for measuring it throughout the conversation within a Digital Role Play.

 

First of all, you should distinguish between two types of Self-Awareness (as also pointed out by Tasha Eurich, in her book and in this interesting article):

  • Internal Self-Awareness – how clearly we evaluate the impact of our actions (including thoughts, feelings, behaviors, strengths and weaknesses)
  • External Self-Awareness – understanding how other people view us in terms of those same factors listed above

 

Measuring and developing both is a great way to develop a complete Self-Awareness, but Leaders can’t simply focus on any of the two, disregarding the other.

We measure the two factors in two different ways:

  • For Internal Self-Awareness, we ask the trainees to self-evaluate their ongoing performance during the development of the conversation.
    Typically, the character in the simulation makes an excuse to pause the conversation and a self-evaluation slider like the one below pops-up, asking the trainee to rate the quality of his performance until then.

 

 

The slider is designed specifically without the indication of measures, offering just a very intuitive color scale to set the preferred level. We absolutely prefer to let the instinctive emotion prevail.

Measuring on the go in such an intuitive way is the best approach to frame the moment.

 

  • For External Self-Awareness, we prefer a very simple questionnaire. The simulation scans the played interview and picks specific moments upon which to ask questions.
    Each question is intended to assess the trainee’s perception about the other party’s evaluation of the trainee’s performance.

 

We compare the self-evaluation of each of the two factors with the equivalent objective evaluation of the user performance in the simulation as calculated by our Digital Role Play algorithm. The distance between the two -expressed in percentage- represents the Self-Awareness.

The smaller the distance, the higher the Self-Awareness, with 100% representing a perfect alignment between the evaluation of the simulation and the self-perception of the user.

The overall Self-Awareness results in a weighted average of the Internal and External Self-Awareness.

 

 

 

The Critical Threshold of Self-Awareness

In order to tell you more about the importance of monitoring Self-Awareness during a training program on leadership, let me introduce two different case studies in which we monitored the development of the performance in critical conversations -which we call “Confidence”- in connection with the development of Self-Awareness.

 

  • The first case study is a project we delivered for a health system operating eight hospitals. We were asked to help design a meaningful training program for developing their managers’ conversational behaviors. The practice schedule was set in a way that, on average, each trainee was taking one simulated conversation per week, over a 20-week program. A total of around 1,500 hours of training was provided to around 200 Leaders involved in the initiative.

 

  • The second case study is a project we developed for a bank in which the middle management was involved in a massive program of leadership development and we were in charge of the practical training on critical conversations. The project was delivered over the course of 12 months with 1200 managers involved in an average of 1 role play / week each.

 

In both cases, we recorded a very interesting correlation between the two variables. As you can see from the graphics below, the improvement in performance started to boost after the Self-Awareness crossed a specific level, a “threshold”.

 

 

In Case Study ONE, it took around seven weeks of practicing -at a low pace- to start obtaining a significant increase in self-awareness. Until then, the overall performance in conversation management was growing at a very slow pace.

But once the trainees reached the critical threshold of 65% in self-awareness, the performance in conversations started to grow faster as well.

 

 

In Case Study TWO, after eight weeks of practicing Self-Awareness the threshold of 72% was crossed, at which point the performance started to grow at a higher speed as well.

We see this phenomenon happen quite frequently when analyzing our Big Data from the practical training sessions.

In fact, performance is related to Learning Agility and Learning Agility widely depends upon Self-Awareness.

 

Until the trainees are sufficiently aware of the impact of their own performance, it is more difficult for them to focus on changing their behaviors.

As self-awareness finally clicks thus revealing this blind spot, learners start realizing that new behaviors are necessary to achieve the results they aim for. Then they start to change for real and at a faster pace.

 

It is a very important point: evidence suggests that there is a threshold above which it becomes easier to turn experience into new behaviors; and new behaviors into better performance. There is no fixed measure for such threshold, of course.

It may vary according to each individual and it does not make much sense to think in terms of averages, but rather try to shape a general conceptual framework.

 

Defining a specific and unique percentage doesn’t matter; what we see is that most of our trainees, once achieving a certain level of Self-Awareness, improve on the other skills at a much faster pace.

The point, however, is that it is highly unlikely for trainees to start the training program at their threshold. Whatever the threshold is, the percentage of “ignition” is typically quite high.
Evidence show us a totally different scenario with regard to the level of Self-Awareness at which the average trainee enters our conversational leadership training programs. Take a look at the data below.

 

A look at Leaders’ average Self-Awareness

Looking at the enormous amount of data available in SkillGym -we track over six million simulated critical conversations by 250k+ Leaders around the world- it is interesting to notice the following distribution with regard to the “entrance” Self-Awareness (i.e., the level of Self-Awareness recorded at the trainees’ first assessment with a Digital Role Play).

 

 

 

Where the five thresholds are:

 

Threshold Range of Self-Awareness Percentage of the population
Very Low
Lower than 35%
12%
Low
Between 35 and 50%
24%
Intermediate
Between 50% and 60%
48%
High
Between 60% and 80%
12%
Very High
Over 80%
4%

 

Basically, our evidence shows how a large majority of Leaders appear to have an intermediate level of Self-Awareness, with a slight predominance of Internal over External Self-Awareness.

 

 

This is a very important point, since the intermediate level of Self-Awareness is far below the level of threshold discussed above. This means that a considerable part of the training effort is normally devoted to increasing Self-Awareness before being able to enjoy the benefits of faster improvement in performance.

 

A considerable part of the training effort is normally devoted to increasing Self-Awareness before being able to enjoy the benefits of faster improvement in performance.

 

Another interesting piece of evidence we collected is about the distribution of Self-Awareness according to the seniority in role (number of years):

 

 

Interesting, isn’t it?

Apparently the more the seniority, the lower the Self-Awareness. It looks like that experience leads to a false sense of confidence, making Leaders overconfident about their level of expertise.

 

Apparently the more the seniority, the lower the Self-Awareness. It looks like that experience leads to a false sense of confidence, making Leaders overconfident about their level of expertise.

 

Practicing on conversations for developing Self-Awareness

Building on Self-Awareness development is a great approach to pave the way to any leadership growth. Of course, there are several ways to develop this factor, but few are as efficient and effective as practicing critical conversations.

We are totally aware, however, that practicing critical conversations through a Digital Role Play system does not provide the means for addressing allof the aspects of one’s own self-awareness.

 

All our triggers, in fact, are directed only to the skills underlying the conversational behaviors we address, in a context characterized by:

  • Certain types of critical conversations
  • One or more objectives to achieve
  • One or more types of psychological profiles
  • A set of behaviors, connected to one or more leadership styles that are deemed as appropriated for the specific situation, according to the several theories and models underlying our methodology

 

That said, we see from field evidence that training in critical conversations using our learning triggers generates a very high impact -level of improvement and efficiency- on the development of Self-Awareness.

There is a reason why training in conversational leadership with Digital Role Play can accelerate the development of crystal-clear self-awareness. Human beings fear confrontation, but when confrontation happens, it becomes a great time for inner self-discussion.

 

Digital Role Plays are the safest way to make this confrontation happen. And the feedback session at the end of each simulation, especially when delivered in the form of a subjective and emotional feedback of the character with whom the trainee was practicing, is a fantastic accelerator of inner self-discussion.

That’s when Self-Awareness gets sharper and sharper.

And if we consider Self-Awareness as the result of an exercise of focusing on our own limits, potential, strengths and weaknesses, certainly practicing in the above context is a great exercise to stimulate a more general approach of self-assessment and self-reflection.

 

 

Factors stimulating Self-Awareness

Our methodology of leadership development through practice on critical conversations relies on the following powerful learning triggers, capable of stimulating trainees’ Self-Awareness (more details of how a SkillGym Digital Role Play works, in this article “Digital Role Plays, the Best Way to Develop Conversational Leadership”):

  • Self-evaluation questions during and at the end of the conversation, as seen above
  • Emotional feedback provided by the character at the end of the simulation
  • Objective metrics showing the actual synthetic outcome of the conversation
  • Objective analysis of every single behavior applied and relevant impact, as outlined by our powerful Augmented Replay

For obvious reasons, we can’t measure the impact on Self-Awareness of other factors external to the simulation’s environment, such as the effects of a tutor-led session to discuss one specific conversation.

 

Over the years, we have carried out several experiments to assess which of the above triggers works best for the development of Self-Awareness and, not surprisingly, we found that the following two:

  • Self-evaluation questions during and at the end of the conversation, as seen above
  • Emotional feedback provided by the character at the end of the simulation

when compared to the other two (more rational) factors are absolutely the key triggers to stimulate the trainees’ attention to the present situation and generate a need for more focused self-evaluation.

 

However, when the four factors come together, it’s where the maximum elicitation of self-awareness happens. We discuss this in greater detail with regard to triggering both sides of the brain with emotional and rational feedback in this interesting article (“Why Stimulate Self-Awareness by Using Both Sides of Your Brain?”).

Finally, in this article (“10 Reasons Why You Should Consider SkillGym for Your Next Leadership Development and Maintenance Program”), I discuss ten good reasons to consider Digital Role Play as a great learning strategy for leadership development including some useful reflection on how to choose wisely the type of solution among those available on the market.

Feel free to comment below or book a 1-hour discovery call of SkillGym.

Leave a Reply

SkillGym Digital Fitness: Pure, Adaptive Leadership Training

 

The concept of Adaptive Learning or Adaptive Training is becoming increasingly popular in the L&D community, as a way to make the learning program easier while have a greater impact on each individual trainee.

Basically, the idea behind Adaptive Learning is relying on technology and data to dynamically modify the contents, the schedule and possibly also the complexity of the learning tasks that are assigned to the learner, according to the updated results -and, let me add, discipline- tracked on the way.

 

Although several studies are published every year showing the positive impact of different approaches to Adaptive Learning, the scientific research is still trying to find a common trait to define the typical characteristic of a well-balanced adapting learning program.

 

The need for personalized training schedules

Two years ago, we at SkillGym started discussing how we could leverage the enormous amount of training data -usage and results- in a way that could possibly deliver a better and more personalized training experience for the Leaders engaged with our Digital Role Play System.

By that point, we already had extensive experience in defining efficient training programs for the development of leadership skills. In this article (“Three Case Studies and One Strategy to Keep Users Engaged with Digital Learning”), I discuss the importance of a well-designed schedule with several case studies in mind.

 

The scientific research is still trying to find a common trait to define the typical characteristic of a well-balanced adaptive learning program.

 

In fact, we noticed that the more the program was designed according to the actual needs of the trainees, the higher was the outcome in terms of ongoing engagement, declared satisfaction and performance improvements on the key metrics that we normally measure (see this article “8 Key Metrics to Ensure a Successful Practical Training on Critical Conversations” for more information on which metrics matter most in a conversational leadership training program).

However, finding the right fit every time for each individual trainee was not easy at the time. Keeping that fit up-to-date without referencing back to some form of AI algorithm would have generated a massive load of extra work for any L&D organization trying to keep up with the progressive needs of each trainee.

 

So we decided to move in the direction of a more structured way to manage the continuous variations required by a well-fitting leadership training program. The idea of Digital Fitness was born.

It came about as a result of the following considerations:

  • Especially for conversational training, it is very important to let the trainees feel like the schedule is tailor-made -not just the content, but especially the pace. In fact, improving conversational skills and acquiring new leadership behaviors requires much more than a one-shot inspirational meet-up.
    You have to work hard and consistently. There is nothing worse than feeling overwhelmed by a program set by somebody else that never fits your busy agenda.

 

  • At the same time, we love to consider the path to the mastery of conversational leadership as a fitness program rather than a learning or even a training activity. The difference may look subtle, but it is very important. It is never done with these skills. It’s not a on-off state where once you learn, it’s done.
    Rather, it’s a keep-it-fit situation: the more you practice, the better you perform. The less you practice, the faster you fall back to your old habits. This is where the metaphor of sports is appropriate. So given our vision, there is nothing better than “digital fitness” as a name to describe what we were after.

 

It took around two years to get to a proper and stable version of the algorithms behind SkillGym Digital Fitness, during which we continuously experimented, mixing the different variables that matter.

 

Start with the self-perceived needs

When trainers decide to enroll their Leaders in a SkillGym Bootcamp and activate our Digital Fitness program -as an alternative to manually scheduling trainees’ training programs- an automatic ongoing process of schedule fine-tuning starts.

 

 

The first step to define a healthy adaptive program is to listen to trainees’ needs, availability and habits.

We do this by delivering a preliminary online questionnaire to each trainee enrolled to a Digital Fitness SkillGym Program. The questionnaire is quite simple to fill out and normally take less than ten minutes.

 

It is divided into sections, for a complete discovery of the following aspects:

  • Effort availability. How much training are you available to sustain?
  • Favorite slots. We are all so busy, it’s best to ask when training best fits the trainees’ schedule.
  • Self-perceived needs. What types of conversations are more critical?
  • Other preferences (how they would like to make the appointments and more questions of this nature).

 

This information is collected and stored by SkillGym and represents the starting point for the individual plan definition.
In fact, SkillGym Digital Fitness initially takes for granted the preferences expressed by the trainee and starts setting the schedule accordingly.

 

Adjusting along the way

The large majority of the cases, however, suggest that reality is quite different from what people declare at their first day at the gym:

  • On average, trainees tend to be busier than they think, so postponing or skipping training sessions becomes quite common.
  • In the long run, real habits show up. So, quite frequently we see trainees ending up training on the same days of the week and very often also at the very same time slots, which is one facet that can be utilized.
  • At the same time, a considerable percentage of trainees tend to overestimate or underestimate -some issues with self-awareness perhaps- their actual learning needs. So, it happens that they perform really well on certain conversations where they thought they would do poorly and vice versa.

 

Digital Fitness continuously monitors:

  • When the trainee actually attends the training session
  • What scores are achieved in the different conversations

and it automatically adjusts the ongoing schedule, adapting the dates of training, the frequency and the types of conversations to play on.

In this way, the initial preferences of the trainees are quickly overwritten by the practical evidence of what needs and availability they really have.

 

Fitting better and better

Any ongoing individual program is normally adjusted weekly or monthly, according to the pace or frequency of training. As soon as new information becomes available, SkillGym Digital Fitness tweaks the schedule accordingly.

At the same time, a historical track record is stored, so when a trainee enrolls in a new Bootcamp, the new preferences get compared to what happened in the past and Digital Fitness has a larger viewpoint to build a dedicated Bootcamp from day one.

 

On average, we see that the typical time required for Digital Fitness to have a significant understanding of the situation and adapt accordingly ranges between a few weeks and a few months. Of course, it depends on the number of interviews booked and played in between.

The more data that becomes available, the faster the learning from the system about the most appropriate schedule is.

 

The outcome of Digital Fitness schedule

Digital Fitness adapts the training program of each trainee by changing any of the following elements:

 

 

  • The overall duration of the program, extending it or reducing it
  • The frequency of practice, adjusting the number of interviews to be played within a certain time slot
  • The timing of practice, according to the highest possible reliability of the user
  • The number of repetitions -and the pedagogical approach to repetitions- of any single critical conversation
  • The types of conversations, the types of characters, the types of subjects to practice on, according to the evolution of the Confidence score and/or other KPI that can be monitored

The result being a much more personalized path toward mastery in conversational leadership.

 

The impact of Digital Fitness

Since the introduction of Digital Fitness, we have been monitoring the impact of this technology, analyzing different points of view, with the scope of finding out where to improve and how our effort was possibly increasing the perceived value for the different types of users of SkillGym.

The evidence collected so far seem to show increasing attention of the user base toward the possibility offered by adapting the training path through the usage of AI and big data.

The main areas of impact are the following.

 

1. Higher trainee engagement

We noticed that a personalized and adaptive training path achieves on average between 25% and 37% extra engagement from trainees, measured as the level of Reliability.

Namely, how many times the user respects a previously scheduled appointment for a Digital Role Play. The higher the match, the higher the Reliability.

 

Look at this article (“8 Key Metrics to Ensure a Successful Practical Training on Critical Conversations”) to learn more about the key metrics of Conversational Leadership training.

 

 

2. Better pedagogical fit

There is almost always a bias between the initially declared training needs and the actual ongoing performance. Most of the times, trainees tend to overestimate their performance in those conversations where they perceive greater comfort and on the flip side, to underestimate their performance on those conversations that they perceive as less comfortable.

 

Digital Fitness big data suggests that on any initially set individual schedule, there is on average a shift of 25-30% in the parameters of frequency of recommended practice and mix of contents.

This is not necessarily bad news: the system goal is not to assess the ability of trainees to predict the best training path on day one. The scope is rather more to provide an increasing better-fitting approach to the ever-changing needs of each trainee.

 

3. Sweeter sentiment

85% of the SkillGym trainees report better perception in terms of schedule fit, both in terms of adaptability to their busy agenda and with regard to the match between the proposed training and their evolving self-perceived needs of practicing.

 

4. Results

We compared the results of manually-set programs and those defined on-the-go by Digital Fitness. On average, trainees following a Digital Fitness adaptive program outperformed the other group by 25% extra improvement on all the KPIs considered along the same period of time and with an overall comparable quantity of effort.

Clearly, adjusting the pace and the content mix makes a huge difference.

 

5. Less work for L&D

Digital Role Play does all this on its own. Of course, trainers can still take control of the assignments. But in practical terms, nobody does it.

On one hand, the system is very smart and is capable of adjusting the program while maintaining the overall expected effort/result balance within a reasonable range.
On the other, the amount of effort needed to achieve the same results in manual mode is simply crazy. Score one for AI.

 

6. Overall higher ROI

We can calculate training ROI in several ways. In this case, a meaningful approach could be that of comparing the effort done by L&D to adapt the individual training path, the overall sentiment of trainees, the extra results achieved, and the overall efficiency of the time spent on training.

Projections are very positive! Adaptive programs can really make a great difference when planning programs for conversational leadership training.

 

 

I hope you enjoyed this tour of one of our favorite features of SkillGym and hopefully I was able to clarify the tremendous benefits of adopting an adaptive training approach.

You are welcome to contact us to learn more about this subject including some case studies to share.

And please feel free to book a 1-hour discovery call of SkillGym.

 

Leave a Reply

Practicing Conversational Leadership: Six Factors to Consider in Designing a Well-Balanced Training Program

 

I recently wrote (“Building a Community of Leadership Abundance”) about the importance of reaching and maintaining mastery in leadership conversations as a way to convey energy, meaning and purpose throughout any team.

In fact, to achieve the highest performance in conversational skills, it requires a high degree of personal confidence in the task and of self-awareness on our own performance.
Both can be developed through practical training in a much more efficient way (“From Critical to Empowering Conversations: Let’s Change the World Using the C-FACTOR”) than simply by only taking dedicated traditional courses, whatever their format being knowledge-based or inspirational.

 

Digital Role Play is a great way to practice critical conversations. We have seen in this article (“Digital Role Plays, the Best Way to Develop Conversational Leadership”) how it can shape a better approach to conversational leadership and we have extensive evidence about the fact that consistent practice (“How Practicing on Digital Role Play Improves Performance: a Case Study”) leads to a more stable acquisition of the fundamental skills we need.

 

To achieve the highest performance in conversational skills, it requires a high degree of personal confidence in the task and of self-awareness on our own performance.

 

The key question, however, when it comes to organizing a practice schedule is about how to balance the effort, the frequency and the type of exercise to meet the needs and the availability of every single Leader who will be enrolled in the program.

Much too often, the training program takes a short-term scheduling approach into account as defined by the Line and/or by the L&D priorities with the risk of underestimating how it actually fits with the trainees’ needs and availability.

 

Today, with the help of in-field case studies, I will focus on how a leadership training program, based on Digital Role Play, should be designed to optimize the results of conversational leadership skills development.

 

Much too often, the training program takes a short-term scheduling approach into account as defined by the Line and/or by the L&D priorities with the risk of underestimating how it actually fits with the trainees’ needs and availability.

 

The following best practices are taken from the analysis of over 15k Leaders, belonging to 20+ different companies. We conducted this extensive study for over 18 months, which then led to the development of an Adaptive Learning Program (described in this article “SkillGym Digital Fitness: Pure, Adaptive Leadership Training”).

It was also very useful in forming the reasoning around the following six characteristics of any well-designed training program:

  1. Program length
  2. Training frequency
  3. Repetitions
  4. Choice of subjects
  5. Adaptive schedule
  6. Learning integrations

 

1. Program length

The first key question is, of course, whether the practical training should be limited to a relatively short and well-defined period of time or if trainees should be left free to develop their skills across a much longer horizon.

What we normally see before introducing Digital Role Plays is that the typical L&D strategy is about adding a long-tail of practical exercises at the end of a 2-day leadership course (whatever the format). On average, this extension can last between 3 to 8 weeks and trainees are assigned with a number of exercises, often including some form of practical training on critical conversations.

 

We have monitored three different approaches:

  • Program 1: an eight-week practical training including role play activity (150 Leaders involved, 1 role play/week) – we have also assessed this group with Digital Role Play to have a common measurement ground
  • Program 2: a six-month dedicated Bootcamp on critical conversations with Digital Role Play (240 Leaders involved, 1 role play/week)
  • Program 3: a nine-month dedicated Bootcamp on critical conversations with Digital Role Play (207 Leaders involved, 1 role play/week)

 

    

Notes:

(*) the two factors were assessed using the same Digital Role Play at the beginning of each program

(**) the same assessment was done at the end of each program

(***) trainees were further assessed after six months from the conclusion of their program

 

As you can see in the above charts, those with the longer tail of training outperformed the other ones in terms of quality in Confidence and Self-Awareness after six months from their last exercise.

Clearly the duration of the training program has a correlation here with the enduring impactover time of the two leadership factors.

In fact, we noticed this evidence popping up all the time and we are more and more inclined to consider practicing on critical conversation as a strategy that should be implemented on an on-going basis rather than a one-shot activity following a formal course.

Ideally, we can expect the best results when formal courses are planned along with the ongoing practical training happening in the background rather than the other way around.

 

2. Training frequency

Another very important ingredient of a well-balanced training program is the frequency with which the trainees participate in exercises.

To find a suitable balance, keeping into account both the effort and the results, we would consider the following two KPIs: Confidence Improvement over Reliability (measuring the actual participation of the trainee to the scheduled appointment).

 

We noticed that although an increase in training frequency may lead to a theoretical increase in performance, it is not always the case since practice that requires too much frequency often leads to disengagement.

The following shows the results, comparing the training program of the four groups of trainees (each group with an average of 200+ Leaders) measured over a nine-months timeline.

Each group was assigned to a different program with different frequency schedule of training:

  • Group 1: One Role Play / Week
  • Group 2: Two Role Plays / Week
  • Group 3: Two Role Plays / Month
  • Group 4: One Role Play / Month

 

 

Clearly the best results in Confidence and Self-Awareness increase are tracked with the:

  • One Role Play / Week
  • Two Role Plays / Month

In fact, that’s where the scheduled program meets the peak of trainees’ actual commitment (reliability of the user to respect the scheduled training appointments), returning a better result in terms of confidence development as well.

 

When the schedule is too loose or too tight, two things happen:

  • On one side, trainees get saturated with the practice (no added effect) or too diluted (the experience is not frequent enough to develop the so-called Deja-vu effect)
  • On the other side, the actual practicing (over the expected scheduled practices) tend to slow down, thus affecting the result

 

3. Repetitions

Practicing is repetition, it’s an old, but very true statement. So, the next question is: how many times the same situation should be repeated and under which pedagogical conditions, in order to fix the experience deep into one’s behaviors?

It’s a key point: no one likes to repeat the same exercise too many times (i.e.: replaying the same role play to fine-tune behaviors and achieve better performance), however repeating the exercise allows for greater development in self-awareness. It’s a not easy to manage the trade-off.

 

There is no unique answer here. Much depends on the type of experience, the conditions of execution, the focus of the trainee and more, such as:

  • The complexity of the role play (for example, introducing AI algorithms helps deliver a similar, but still slightly different experience, what we call “authentic” experience)
  • The time distance between repetition. The larger, the better. Both in terms of user experience and in terms of pedagogical efficiency

 

My recommendation would be:

  • Rely on AI-based Digital Role Play to ensure a much more realistic user experience (vs a branched and very predictable solution)
  • Make sure that the training schedule is organized in a way that the repetition happens either immediately after the previous interview (only once in this case; pedagogical approach: experience intensity) or, on the contrary and preferred, after at least 4-6 weeks (pedagogical approach: experience dilution)
  • Allow a maximum of 3-4 repetitions of the same scenario along a 1-year program, making sure to contextualize (i.e.: explain very well): why the trainee should repeat the same exercise and where to look at for improvements
  • Adding more and more repetitions of the same scenario won’t add any value to fixing the behavior, especially if it is done with intensity in a short period of time

 

Bringing the three above variables together (duration, frequency, repetition), my experience is that a good balance would be:

  • A year-long schedule upon which all the leadership traditional training can reconnect
  • A smooth and consistent frequency of around two interviews / month
  • A slight repetition of key interviews (those where it makes sense to reflect on), say two to three times / year

Of course, it’s not just about quantity. So, keep reading below.

 

4. Choice of subjects

Correctly choosing the exercise is just as important as the pace of training. There is no point in practicing something that does not matter.

Conversations are not all the same. On one side, of course, the development of factors such as self-confidence can happen with any conversation if supported with a good pedagogical approach.

On the other side, however, other factors such as conversational confidence and even certain behavior-related skills are very situation sensitive. So, it is important to balance wisely from the point of view of which scenario to assign.

 

Again, quite often we see certain L&D strategies focusing on one or two specific competencies: best-selling are things like “giving feedback”, “negotiate”, “solving conflicts” and so on.

That’s certainly one way: focusing on specific areas where gaps have been detected.
It makes a lot of sense, of course.

 

However, we noticed that the entire set of skills behind conversational leadership improve faster and in a more balanced way when the program focuses on a broader set of types of conversations and situations. The best practice here would be to fly higher over the single circumstance or need and try to extend the training program to a much more comprehensive set of skills.

One good way would be to consider the 80/20 principle, by which 20% of the situations generate 80% of the impact.

Select the 20% of all types of conversation that normally happen at work and create a training program covering all of them over an extended period of practice (according to the above indications with regards duration, frequency and repetition).

 

5. Adaptive schedule

The best approach for optimizing the pace and the content mix is definitely that of embracing the so-called adaptive learning strategy. It’s becoming a more and more popular topic nowadays and it consists of tweaking the content and the intensity of the learning program according to each trainee’s unique and developing needs.

Often though, it’s easier said than done, especially if you are delivering a very extensive (in time and in number of trainees) training program with multiple variables (quantitative and qualitative) to consider for measuring the impact of your choices and adjusting the formula along the way.

 

My best advice here is to rely on AI-based frameworks capable of generating and analyzing in real time large quantities of data coming from the usage of the training tool and providing a self-adjusting way to fine-tune both the pace and the content mix of the training.

A good example of an adaptive training program for Digital Role Play is discussed in this article (“SkillGym Digital Fitness: Pure, Adaptive Leadership Training”).

Certainly, the possibility adapting the training contents and pace to the need, availability, focus and reliability of each trainee can result in a much higher long-term engagement and, consequently, better long-term results in skills’ improvement.

 

6. Learning integrations

We often see this scenario: the leadership course is designed around a 2-3 day inspirational and knowledge-based experience and some follow-up is then prescribed for the following 4-8 weeks.

As discussed above, designing a training based on practice delivers a much higher impact:

  • On performance KPIs
  • On long-term competency retention
  • On overall engagement

 

However, I am not saying that you don’t need any form of traditional learning formats. Instead, all our evidence clearly shows the importance of defining a well-balanced mix between self-paced practicing on Digital Role Play, face-to-face inspirational training and human-lead (live or remote) support.

Look at this case study: two groups of around 150 Leaders each (comparable in terms of age, seniority and role).

 

Training Program Group 1 Training Program Group 2
One initial day of inspirational training (classes of 10-12 people)
One initial day of inspirational training (classes of 10-12 people)
Six months of self-paced training on Digital Role Play
Six months of self-paced training on Digital Role Play
No other human support or knowledge-based integration along the way
Monthly individual remote support (20 mins. / trainee)
Three one-day live sessions spread along the entire program for re-cap and discussion (10 people / group)

 

Clearly, introducing face-to-face and remote support in the form of inspirational, knowledge-feeding and discussion-based interaction made a significant difference in the way the two different groups kept their engagement along the way.

 

It is not easy to evaluate the difference between the two groups in terms of performance goal achievement, mainly because improvements are very much related to practicing.

However, increasing and maintaining the engagement, as well as providing on-time human support is certainly one of the most important elements for the best integration of a well-balanced training program.

 

Conclusions

We have seen six key elements that you should always consider when planning for an efficient conversational leadership training program.

According to best practices that we continuously collect and from the evidence shown above, I think that the following can be considered a fairly well-balanced formula:

  • Plan for the long term. Instead of adding a few weeks of exercises as the long tail of a scheduled leadership class, try to flip it over. Design a long-term practice schedule upon which you will add-on any relevant learning activity to keep the momentum and deliver human-lead inspiration and support.
  • Adapt frequency of use and repetition according to the audience, with the scope in mind of maximizing the reliability of trainees.
  • If you can rely on a Digital Role Play tool to allow adaptive scheduling, go for it. It probably won’t cost you that much more, but it certainly delivers higher value in terms of consistent engagement of users.
  • Make sure that you cover all the areas of leadership conversations, instead of focusing on the problem of the day. But do so wisely. Choose the 20% of conversations that make 80% of the difference in leadership effectiveness.
  • Keep the human factor as a part of your formula. Self-paced practicing is powerful, but it becomes even more effective when mixed with real inspirational training delivered at the right time.

 

Ideally, we can expect the best results when formal courses are planned along with ongoing practical training happening in the background rather than the other way around.

 

At this point you may want to learn more about:

Thanks for reading!

Leave a Reply

Building a Community of Leadership Abundance

 

Recently, I was discussing three ideas that are quite fascinating from a conceptual point of view, but also much more practical than one could expect.

Here they are:

  1. Leadership is not a badge that we can just pin on our own jacket. Instead, it’s something that we get recognized for by other people, typically members of our community or, if we are well known enough, even by people we don’t know directly;
  2. Others start recognizing your leadership footprint through several types of signals. Among them is a prominent role in the way you manage communication, and empowering conversations specifically. People need Leaders, people search for Leaders, and they love to recognize leadership through the way you treat them;
  3. Leadership, in its purest form, generates new leadership. This is an age old saying. But it makes a lot of sense to me right now. A true Leader is capable of igniting the light of greatness in other people. This can happen in many ways of course, and certainly conversations are one of the “highways” for this type of ignition.

 

Starting from there, in this article I invite you to reflect on a couple of powerful questions: how does leadership training, and in particular conversational leadership training really contribute to the development of a more abundant leadership?

What can we do to help to develop the idea that, at least in this field, “scarcity” can be defeated, and leadership can be seeded, nurtured and finally harvested without limits?

 

Seed communication, harvest Leaders

While reflecting on these intriguing questions, I came across to an interesting article (you can find it here) dealing with the never-ending fight between scarcity and abundance.

I totally share the point of the Walt Institute and the angle they suggest in the article about the correlation between mindset and leadership: “The way you think about the situation has a substantial impact on the way you handle stress, work with others, your level of resilience and the success you experience in the world”.

 

Specifically, one of the points they highlight in their five recommendations on how to cultivate an abundance mindset: “Appreciate your team and colleagues – let them know how much you value their contribution. The more genuine appreciation you give to individuals, the more positive influence you will have”.

This is where I focus every day and where I think leadership training can make a difference.

 

Somehow and from this perspective, the answers to the two above questions become quite straightforward: conversational leadership training, delivered in practical and actionable ways such as Digital Role Plays, can help on the development of a more abundant leadership by helping people improve on the way they appreciate, motivate, and drive their team through genuine and efficient communication.

Pursued consistently, this contribution can definitely support the virtuous development of abundance of leadership through a chain-like effect.

 

In writing this, however, I realize that some of you may raise some more, deeper questions that are worth considering:

  • How the mastery of conversations turns people into Leaders?
  • How conversations can help Leaders to develop new Leaders (a sort of “legacy of leadership”)?
  • Finally, how all this can lead to a whole new level of energy, to a virtuous ecosystem where leadership itself spreads through generations while simply helping people feel appreciated and energized (a “community of abundance”)?

So, our reflection today starts here, let’s try to answer.

 

Well managed conversations boost leadership

It’s a fact. Leadership is not a skill. It’s a recognition from others when they perceive you as inspiring, reassuring, motivating, driving and all the other adjectives you may want to add to the list.

People around you perceive your leadership by observing and judging your results, your example and the way you communicate with them. What matters to them is how you care about them, how you help them, how you inspire and motivate them toward results that can be shared as a team.

Leadership is the recognized result of your efforts to improve yourself and the world around you.

It’s at the same time a destination and an endless path since leadership requires maintenance and you can always become a better version of yourself.

 

On the other side, a “conversation” is also not a skill. It’s rather the place where certain skills can be applied and where part of your leadership can flourish.
Conversations are very much connected to the concept of leadership in fact, because among any other leadership factors, they are the most suitable place where you get the most in touch with other people and where other people get close to your way of dealing with them and treating them.

The results of a conversation are almost always significant for how your leadership is perceived and very often such perception is so thin that you need a very high degree of self-awareness to understand the real results of your conversations and just as much level of confidence to be comfortable enough to deal with certain types of conversations,

 

But, in any case, a conversation transfers energy. Whether it is positive or negative energy is mainly up to you, to your confidence, to your communication skills and to your self-awareness in recognizing when it is time to adapt your approach. When the energy you transmit is positive, people start feeling better.

And the better they feel, the more they will be keen to follow-up in a positive way. This is one of leadership’s most important footprints.

 

Conversation after conversation, you will not only improve your fundamental communication skills, including the paramount self-awareness and confidence in dealing with critical conversations, but also expose your approach, your intimate core beliefs, your decisions, and your example.

You will expose yourself to the judgement of the people around you in a more intimate way, of course. Putting your effort in mastering the art of critical conversations will help to boost the way you are perceived, but also the impact of your work.

And if you do a good job, your leadership will grow in the eyes of the people you engage.

 

Energized people can become the next Leaders

Let’s raise the bar. It’s not just a matter of how other people perceive you. As a Leader or not. It’s not a beauty contest. It’s an opportunity for a higher aim.

Being recognized as Leaders offers the opportunity to amplify your message, whatever it is. At the same time, it carries the responsibility of working hard to seed and nurture the next generation of Leaders.

To make an organization really great, leadership must generate and spread in every role from every employee, every manager, every staff member.
Great Leaders are those who have the highest responsibility to leverage their skills and influence to develop all the people around them as well as help them to become new Leaders.

 

Once again, this responsibility must be met with several ingredients, but helping to spread the culture of empowering conversations by being a living example of it, is one of the most important.

In this way, you will not only nurture better-energized team members, but you will also inject into them, by your example, the best approach of all: listening and supporting others through conversations.

People around us continually judge the importance we give to the things we say by observing the things we do.
Leading by empowering conversation as the peak and moment at which any decision is made and of any action required is a great way to put conversations at the center of collective leadership development.

 

You will be surprised by the chain effect that generates from here. Those that are considered “critical” conversations will turn into nurturing and energizing moments, where everyone will be happy to stay.

And the collective mindset will move much faster from the “scarcity” to the “abundance” side of reality perception.

You may think of developing a conversation culture as a higher aim of getting recognized as a Leader. As Maya Angelou said, “At the end of the day people won’t remember what you said or did, they will remember how you made them feel”. Developing a culture of empowering conversations is the ultimate way to develop your leadership’s legacy.

 

The next level

What can generate from this revolution – did you think even for one second about a revolution while reading these lines? Just imagine.

A world where “critical” (and avoidable) conversations turn into “empowering” (and enjoyable) conversations creating a world where Leaders develop new Leaders and where collective energy flows throughout organizations and teams.

A new community made of people who feel better by energizing other people through their communication skills and a well-maintained self-awareness; where Leaders can develop their legacy in a very practical, actionable and effective way for the benefit of the entire group.
A group of growing mindsets and Leaders supporting each other through intimate, clear, and consistent empowering conversations.

 

Our recommendation for you? Start now.
Start now to work on your skills that bring you closer to your employees.
Start now to ask yourself how self-aware you are about the way you manage what you may call “critical conversation”.
Start now to grow your confidence in this very important step towards true leadership.

There is a potential Leader inside each of us that can be discovered and recognized by others according to how much energy we are capable of conveying and igniting through conversations.

 

Conversations have superpowers

When Leaders start developing their skills around critical conversations, turning them into empowering moments, individual energy gets multiplied. Visions get shared and collective efforts are organized more efficiently to solve problems and leverage opportunities.
If we strive to think big and we imagine new ways to grow this potential, we start to talk about abundance.

Abundance of energy, of trust, of clarity, of influence. Abundance of better people.

 

People grow in an environment that naturally nurtures reciprocal respect, manages stress, dissipates fear and encourages each person to expand their own comfort zone. This is where each of us is naturally nudged to grow an abundance mindset.

Next time you think about growing the leadership of your organization, think about what type of investment you are pursuing toward encouraging the development of empowering conversation as a signature of your organization’s culture.

 

Next step

Wow, what a long reflection. Sorry if I went too long, but I think it was worth.

You may now be interested in learning more about ways to make all this possible in an efficient and measurable way.

In this article (“From Critical to Empowering Conversations: Let’s Change the World Using the C-FACTOR”), I discuss how practicing critical conversation makes all the difference between great Leaders and the rest of us.

If you are looking around to find the Digital Role Play solution that suits your needs, we explore some useful criteria in this article (“Digital Role Plays, the Best Way to Develop Conversational Leadership”) to help you select wisely.

 

Please take some time to peruse our website. There is plenty of inspiring content including pre-recorded webinars and articles.

Of course, I would be delighted to continue this conversation with you, just schedule a 1-hour discovery call with us.

Enjoy the rest of your day.

Leave a Reply